Thursday, March 20, 2014

Twerking the Bear's Tail



Here's what's happening in Ukraine (watch both videos, they are different):








Well, shit, you know I like to write, and since I already got you on my webpage, might as well write a quick and dirty analysis of what the fuck is going on.

Basically it is a game of: see how much we can get away with, or, Tweaking the Bear's Tail.

Act one: Kosovo.

As we all know, Serbs were literally hitler, they had concentration camps and all kinds of shit, and are eeeeeeevil.  Incidentally, here is some info on the jihadis, excuse me, "mujahedin freedom fighters" fighting the evil Serbs:

Bosnian mujahideen (wiki)

Foreign mujahideen arrived in central Bosnia in the second half of 1992. with the aim of helping their Bosnian Muslim (Bosniak) coreligionists to defend themselves from the Serb and Croat forces. Mostly they came from North Africa, the Near East and the Middle East. On 13 August 1993, the Bosnian government officially organized foreign volunteers into the detachment known as El Mudžahid in order to impose control and order. Initially, the foreign mujahideen gave food and other basic necessities to the local Muslim population, deprived many necessities by the Serb forces. Once hostilities broke out between the Bosnian government and the Croat forces (HVO), the mujahideen also participated in battles against the HVO alongside ARBiH units.
The foreign mujahideen actively recruited young local men, offering them military training, uniforms and weapons. As a result, some local Bosniaks joined the foreign mujahideen and in the process became local mujahideen, They imitated the foreigners in both the way they dressed and behaved, to such an extent that it was sometimes, according to the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) documentation in subsequent war crimes trials, "difficult to distinguish between the two groups". For that reason, the ICTY has used the term "Mujahideen" (which they spell Mujahedin) to designate foreigners from Arab countries, but also local Muslims (i.e. Bosniaks) who joined the mujahideen units.
They quickly attracted heavy criticism from people who claimed their presence was evidence of violent Islamic fundamentalism in Europe. The foreign volunteers became unpopular even with many of the Bosniak population, because the Bosnian army had thousands of troops and had no need for more soldiers (especially controversial ones who could undermine their reputation as a defending army), but for arms.

A pic or two of the freedom fighters fighting in Europe against the (White, Christian) eeeevil Serbs:





Yep, it's a decapitated head held by a mujahedin hero of the Bosnian-Serb war.  But it's OK, because the head belongs (er, belonged) to a White Male Christian.


So Yugoslavia-Serbia lost the war to Croatia and Bosnia (and, more importantly, NATO led USA forces) and  lost lots of great tourist territory near the Adriatic.  There was this small region, called Kosovo, which the Serbs have in their hearts, due to legends and history and some young idiot king losing his army (and his head) and is basically considered a Serb historic land where the Serbs began or somesuch (I dunno, talk to a Serb, they'll clue you in).

Problem was that, from the nearby Albania, Albanians have moved in, and they started breeding like rabbits.  Soon the population of Albanians was much greater than the local Serbs.  And, seizing a historical chance, the Albanians started a terrorist war - excuse me, what shall we call it - a freedom campaign of ethnic cleansing and mass burning of Serb Christian Orthodox churches.

NATO forces, seeing that the eeeeevil Serbs were up to their old tricks again, sent in the bombers and NATO troops.  And all became right with the world, as the Kosovo became the site of a massive American military base as well as the place where the Albanian organized crime can do their drug and human slave (kidnapped women forced into prostitution) happen - excuse me, free market business is finally happening in Kosovo unlike when the Serbs were keeping a lid on it.  Here's the American ambassador, chatting with the KLA (Kosovo Liberation Army) commander, with his socks off, as a sign of respect:





To help these lovely people, the free market loving, non-Christian KLA guys, we (America) did this:


 But it's OK, because these are White Christians.

An interesting tidbit about the whole Kosovo fracas was the incident in which an American hero, General Wesley Clark, ordered a NATO (British) unit to directly engage Russian paratroopers who landed in Pristina airport. The mission of the Russians was to prevent genocide or somesuch against the Serbs.


 Let Independent, UK tell the story:

Kosovo, June 1999. Serbia has withdrawn from the campaign. Hundreds of thousands of refugees wait over the border to return to their homes. A column of 30,000 Nato troops is advancing towards Pristina airfield – a crucial strategic position.

Unexpectedly, the Russian forces, reach the airfield first; Russia, Serbia's patron, is hoping to stake a claim in the occupation. The soldiers are pointing their weapons at the incoming Allied troops. "Destroy!" orders the US general over the radio – instructions from the very top. World War Three is on the cards. Enter crooner James Blunt. Crisis averted.
Uh, oh....

In a BBC radio interview last night, Blunt said: "I was given the direct command to overpower the 200 or so Russians who were there. I was the lead officer, with my troop of men behind us... The soldiers directly behind me were from the Parachute Regiment, so they're obviously game for the fight.
"The direct command [that] came in from General Wesley Clark was to overpower them," he said. "Various words were used that seemed unusual to us. Words such as 'destroy' came down the radio. We had 200 Russians lined up pointing their weapons at us aggressively ... and we'd been told to reach the airfield and take a hold of it. That's why we were querying our instruction." The end result was a victory for British common sense. "Fortunately," Blunt recalled, "up on the radio came General Sir Mike Jackson [commander of the British forces], whose words were, 'I'm not going to have my soldiers start World War Three.'
Now, remember, that Serbs were (and are) considered Russia's "Little Brothers", due to sharing of the Christian Orthodox faith and history - remember, that Russia entered World War 1 to protect Serbia from Austrian aggression.

The Balkan wars, and especially the stealing of Kosovo from Serbia, was the first tweaking of the Russian Bear's Tail.

Having seen that Russia was basically powerless before the forces of "good", "freedom" and "free market", why not do it again?

Now, this won't be ever said on American teevee "news" in my country the Yoo Ess of Ey, but there was an agreement made with Russia after the fall of the Iron Curtain - i.e. after Poland, Czechoslovakia (then still not split up), East Germany got their freedom from Soviet tyranny.

Der Spiegel, German, from November 26, 2009:

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has accused the West of breaking promises made after the fall of the Iron Curtain, saying that NATO's expansion into Eastern Europe violated commitments made during the negotiations over German reunification. Newly discovered documents from Western archives support the Russian position.
 Lets read on:

The question of what Moscow was in fact promised in 1990 has sparked a historical dispute with far-reaching consequences for Russia's future relationship with the West. But what exactly is the truth?

The various players involved have different versions of events. Of course there was a promise not to expand NATO "as much as a thumb's width further to the East," Mikhail Gorbachev, the Soviet president at the time, says in Moscow today. However, Gorbachev's former foreign minister, Eduard Shevardnadze, speaking in the Georgian capital Tbilisi, says that there were no such assurances from the West. Even the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact, the Eastern military alliance, "was beyond our imagination," he says.

For years former US Secretary of State James Baker, Shevardnadze's American counterpart in 1990, has denied that there was any agreement between the two sides. But Jack Matlock, the US ambassador in Moscow at the time, has said in the past that Moscow was given a "clear commitment." Hans-Dietrich Genscher, the German foreign minister in 1990, says this was precisely not the case.
So it's a he said, she said.  The Russians are claiming that there was an agreement to not expand NATO into the East, especially the former Soviet republics, and Western (well, not all of them, some of them are not lying, err, I mean, not remembering what happened exactly).

So what is Spiegel's conclusion?
After speaking with many of those involved and examining previously classified British and German documents in detail, SPIEGEL has concluded that there was no doubt that the West did everything it could to give the Soviets the impression that NATO membership was out of the question for countries like Poland, Hungary or Czechoslovakia.
Fortunately, such level of investigation and political analysis will never, ever, ever, ever happen either in American newspapers nor on American "news" programs.  So the ten of you that read this blog, congratulations! You are ahead of the curve, have a cookie.

The Spiegel is an interesting article, a historical document if you will.

On Feb. 10, 1990, between 4 and 6:30 p.m., Genscher spoke with Shevardnadze. According to the German record of the conversation, which was only recently declassified, Genscher said: "We are aware that NATO membership for a unified Germany raises complicated questions. For us, however, one thing is certain: NATO will not expand to the east." And because the conversion revolved mainly around East Germany, Genscher added explicitly: "As far as the non-expansion of NATO is concerned, this also applies in general."

Shevardnadze replied that he believed "everything the minister (Genscher) said."
And further reading:

At the beginning of 1990, the Soviet Union was still a world power with troops stationed at the Elbe River, and Hans Modrow, the former Dresden district chairman of the East German Communist Party, the SED, was in charge in East Berlin. But the collapse of the East German state was foreseeable.

Bonn's allies in Paris, London and Washington were concerned about the question of whether a unified Germany could be a member of NATO or, as had already happened in the past, would pursue a seesaw policy between east and west.
Genscher wanted to put an end to this uncertainty, and he said as much in a major speech to the West on Jan. 31, 1990 in Tutzing, a town in Bavaria. This was the reason, he said, why a unified Germany should be a member of NATO.

But how could the Soviet leadership be persuaded to support this solution? "I wanted to help them over the hurdle," Genscher told SPIEGEL. To that end, the German foreign minister promised, in his speech in Tutzing, that there would not be "an expansion of NATO territory to the east, in other words, closer to the borders of the Soviet Union." East Germany was not to be brought into the military structures of NATO, and the door into the alliance was to remain closed to the countries of Eastern Europe.
OK, but this was one German dude, what was the official American position?

US Secretary of State James Baker, a pragmatic Texan, apparently "warmed to the proposal immediately," says Elbe today. On Feb. 2, the two diplomats sat down in front of the fireplace in Baker's study in Washington, took off their jackets, put their feet up and discussed world events. They quickly agreed that there was to be no NATO expansion to the East. "It was completely clear," Elbe comments.
What about the UK's position?

A short time later, then-British Foreign Secretary Douglas Hurd joined the German-American consensus. As a previously unknown document from the German Foreign Ministry shows, Genscher was uncharacteristically open with his relatively pro-German British counterpart when they met in Bonn on Feb. 6, 1990. Hungary was about to hold its first free elections, and Genscher declared that the Soviet Union needed "the certainty that Hungary will not become part of the Western alliance if there is a change of government." The Kremlin, Genscher said, would have to be given assurances to that effect. Hurd agreed.
So what were the then-Soviets, now Russians promised:

What the US secretary of state said on Feb. 9, 1990 in the magnificent St. Catherine's Hall at the Kremlin is beyond dispute. There would be, in Baker's words, "no extension of NATO's jurisdiction for forces of NATO one inch to the east," provided the Soviets agreed to the NATO membership of a unified Germany. Moscow would think about it, Gorbachev said, but added: "any extension of the zone of NATO is unacceptable."
There you have it.  There was an agreement between two powers that Germany, the full, united Germany could be in NATO, no problem, but that NATO won't move closer to the borders of Russia.

I don't know why Russians wanted "buffer states" between themselves and NATO, perhaps some experiences they have had some experiences back in the day, say, in 1941...

Now, 20 years later, Gorbachev is still outraged when he is asked about this episode. "One cannot depend on American politicians," he told SPIEGEL.
Haha, my silly Russian friend.  How do you know when an American politician is lying? His lips are moving.




So what happened?

Of course NATO aggressively expanded ever eastward.  While originally NATO was made to prevent Soviet (and Warsaw Pact) aggression into the West, once the Soviet Union fell, why was it still around?

Good question.

Interestingly, NATO morphed from a defensive into an offensive organization - it went on the attack; in Serbia, more recently in Libya and many other places.

So, to answer, just like before, NATO became (if it ever was not) a vehicle for American ambitions and goals in Europe (and North Africa... actually global reach).  NATO became a vehicle to implement American policy in Europe - you know, the killing of White Christians and supporting Al Queda in Europe, supporting massive organized crime and human slavery (women kidnapped and forced into prostitution), that kind of thing...

And of course NATO expanded ever eastward - Czech Republic, Bulgaria, Hungary, Slovakia, Slovenia (that's in ex-Yugoslavia).

And then of course ever MORE eastward, because while it could be said that yes, Poland, Bulgaria, Hungary... well, OK, but then came Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia...

And in the Balkans Albania (so the eeeevil Serbs won't get uppity re: Kosovo) and Croatia.

Meanwhile Russia was getting more and more isolated, as if in punishment for not allowing the good times under Yeltsin continue ("good times" for the international elites, who robbed the country blind; when Putin came in, he put in his own crew who stopped the wholesale transfer of goods, money, gold, hell, everything into the coffers of "our" elites).

After Russia was getting more concerned...





The next chapter of Twerking the Bear's Tail Fantastic happened in Georgia - no, not the American state, but the independent nation near Russia.

I wrote extensively about the Ossetia War.  All my articles are on the side bar to the right, under the "The Ossetia War Collection" title.

Long story short, it is another ethnic mess. A minority, called Ossetians, broke away from Georgia, because they claimed discrimination and being 2nd class citizens in that country.  On the other end of Georgia, another minority, the Abkhazians, also broke away from Georgia and made their own mini-country, so perhaps there was something to these claims...

We here in the Yoo Ess of Ey always support democracy, and how could we not support the ever so freedom loving president Mr. Mikheil Saakashvili.

Here's a video of Georgian police storming and shutting down a TV station newscast which was a bit too critical towards Mr. Saakashvili's government.


I can smell the fea.... I mean freedom over here.  America is ever the friend of freedom around the world (tm).


Here's YNET (Israel) article about Israeli connections to Georgia pre-war:

War in Georgia: The Israeli connection, from 08.10.08:

The fighting which broke out over the weekend between Russia and Georgia has brought Israel's intensive involvement in the region into the limelight. This involvement includes the sale of advanced weapons to Georgia and the training of the Georgian army's infantry forces. 
Israel began selling arms to Georgia about seven years ago following an initiative by Georgian citizens who immigrated to Israel and became businesspeople.

"They contacted defense industry officials and arms dealers and told them that Georgia had relatively large budgets and could be interested in purchasing Israeli weapons," says a source involved in arms exports.
The military cooperation between the countries developed swiftly. The fact that Georgia's defense minister, Davit Kezerashvili, is a former Israeli who is fluent in Hebrew contributed to this cooperation.
"His door was always open to the Israelis who came and offered his country arms systems made in Israel," the source said. "Compared to countries in Eastern Europe, the deals in this country were conducted fast, mainly due to the defense minister's personal involvement."  

Interesting fact - independent Georgia's Defense Minister was an Israeli.  This is not so strange in our modern world, as the director of the American Federal Reserve is also not an American citizen but an Israeli citizen.

Anybody who sees something strange or even, gods forbid, wrong with this setup, is a racist bigot anti-semitic neanderthal.

So, Israel was selling mucho modern weapons to Georgia.  What was the Yoo Ess of Ey doing?

Reuters: U.S. troops start training exercise in Georgia Jul 15, 2008:

One thousand U.S. troops began a military training exercise in Georgia on Tuesday against a backdrop of growing friction between Georgia and neighboring Russia.
Officials said the exercise, called "Immediate Response 2008", had been planned for months and was not linked to a stand-off between Moscow and Tbilisi over two Russian-backed separatists regions of Georgia. 
The United States is an ally of Georgia and has irritated Russia by backing Tbilisi's bid to join the NATO military alliance.
What we have here is the breaking of the agreement of not expanding NATO eastward... it is expanding NATO waaaaaaaay fucking east, as Georgia is on the other side of Russia, looking on the map on the right side of Russia (look it up, look up where Germany is and where Georgia is on a map).

Although the article was scrubbed, there was an article and it is copied on my blog (again, the original was scrubbed from existence).  The article concerns Georgian military buildup before the invasion of Ossetia:
TSKHINVALI (Tiraspol Times) - Despite not being at war with anyone, for the year 2007 the military budget of Georgia is showing the highest growth rate of any country in the world, with much of it being financed openly and directly by its key military partner, the United States.
As a result, fears run high in Tskhinvali these days.
The capital of the small Republic of South Ossetia is increasingly seen as the next target of Georgian military aggression, and many here worry that it is only a matter of time before enemy troops unleash an assault on the city.

Some international analysts agree. Vicken Cheterian, a journalist and political analyst who works for the non-profit governance organization CIMERA, based in Geneva, says that "Georgia's military plans reveal its ambition to reclaim the territories of Abkhazia and South Ossetia it lost in the wars of the early 1990s."
The journalist, who is a regular contributor to Le Monde Diplomatique, points out that since the "rose revolution" of 2003-04, Georgian military spending has effectively been increased by over forty times. The majority of Georgia's arms purchases are financed directly or indirectly from Washington. Salaries for Georgian soldiers have also repeatedly been paid for by American taxpayers.
So a massive buildup of weapons.

What happened after all these weapons were acquired and the Georgian military sufficiently trained?

 
Why, ethnic cleansing, of course.  A repeat of Kosovo.

Here's what happened, a BBC docu which, again, won't ever, ever, ever be shown in Yoo Ess of Ey:


Except this time, the Russian army was not under Gorbatchev or, gods forbid, the idiot village drunk, Yeltsin.  It was controlled by president Medvedev (read: Putin).

Russian forces went in and kicked Georgian butt all the way back, incidentally preventing genocide of Ossetians.  There are wonderful videos of Georgian tanks rolling into an Ossetian city and shooting the hell out of windows while taking no fire, just for the fun of it... The Georgian soldiers were literally whooping with joy - well, when the Russian tanks and fighter-bombers came in there were being shot back at and there was much less shouting for joy and much more running...



The most interesting reaction to all this was in the American media.  Simply put, it was one gigantic lie.

On CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS, over and over the TV presenters, the Congress peoples, the Senators, all of them were saying that there must be sanctions on Russia, that Russia was invading our friends, Georgia.  McCain, as usual, was hysterical:

WASHINGTON (AFP) - Republican White House hopeful John McCain said Monday Russia appears bent on extinguishing Georgia's independence as he demanded a united Western front to protect the former Soviet republic.

The United States should dispatch "immediate economic and humanitarian assistance to help mitigate the impact the invasion has had on the people of Georgia," McCain said in a statement he read to reporters in Pennsylvania.
This was typical of the times.

What made my day was that FOX "news" invited a 12 year old girl and her mother but they made a slight boo-boo... these were Ossetians, and they let the host know who was the aggressor and who was the victim, and they live, on air thanked Russia for helping them...  Good times 


But this was a momentary blip in the massive propaganda being shat upon from our teevees and radios and newspapers, all of them, ALL OF THEM, in lockstep, repeated the same lie: "Russia invaded Georgia!".

So how did it end?

There was no genocide, Russians saved the Ossetians from a terrible fate, and the aggressors got their dues.

Incidentally, Georgia is still not a member of NATO - a lesson was learned.





But not by "our" Western elites (the word "our" is in quotation marks, because while they are our rulers, they are neither European nor consider themselves European nor White - it is a separate ethnic group, no cookie for you if you can guess who they are).

Next up - Ukraine!


Here's Victoria Nuland on the phone with the American ambassador to Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt.  Now, American ambassador to Ukraine, that immediately explains who he is, but who the fuck is this Vicky gal?

What is this American hick Christian woman... wait a moment...

Wikipedia: Victoria Nuland:

Nuland is the daughter of Yale bioethics and medicine professor Sherwin B. Nuland, whose original surname was Nudelman. Victoria’s paternal grandfather was Meyer Nudelman from a family of Jewish immigrants who came to New York City from the Russian Empire.
All clear now.

But what is she, really?  I mean, what the fuck is her function?

Nuland is a career Senior Officer of the United States Foreign Service and has worked for both Democratic and Republican administrations. During the Bill Clinton administration, Nuland was chief of staff to Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott before moving on to serve as deputy director for former Soviet Union affairs. During the George W. Bush administration, she served as the principal deputy foreign policy adviser to Vice President Dick Cheney and then as U.S. ambassador to NATO. During the Barack Obama administration, she was special envoy for Conventional Armed Forces in Europe before assuming the position of State Department spokesperson in summer 2011, which she held until February 2013.
Looks like she is neither a Republican nor Democrat, but works in the American government no matter whoever is in power, whether Democrat or Republican.

Fascinating, isn't it?

Works for Cheney, Obama, Bush - does not matter, she does her thing.

Amazing!

I guess Jews in America work both sides of the... Shit, sorry, slip of the finger, I mean, she is just that good that no matter who is elected, whelp!, there she is!  I assume she would be working in a Chinese People's Liberation Army government in America with nary a problem also.

She was nominated to serve as Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs in May 2013 and sworn in to fill that role in September 2013.
Pardon me, but what the fuck is an "Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs"?  Also from Wiki:
The Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs is a position within the American Department of State that leads the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs charged with implementing American foreign policy in Europe and Eurasia, and with advising the Under Secretary for Political Affairs on matters relating to diplomatic missions within that area.
 Basically she runs shit in Europe and the part of Asia close to Europe (think Russian Far East).

The wikipedia article on her also lists her spouse, err, lets use the proper word - husband.  It is Robert Kagan.

That name sounds familiar.

Wikipedia: Robert Kagan:
Robert Kagan (born September 26, 1958 in Athens, Greece) is an American historian, author, columnist, and foreign policy commentator at the Brookings Institution. A co-founder of the Project for the New American Century, Kagan is a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. He been a foreign policy advisor to several U.S. Republican presidential candidates as well as to Hillary Clinton, when she was Secretary of State under President Obama.
If you don't know what the Project for the New American Century was (and perhaps is), stop reading my blog and immediately, immediately go to duckduckgo or google and search for it.

Interestingly, a pattern emerges of him also working for both Republicans and Democrats.  It seems that no matter which goy moron is elected in our "democracy", the Jews run the show... Shit! I mean, he, just like his wife Victoria Nuland, is so good that both Republicans and Democrats beg him to work for them.  That's what I meant.


Hopefully, you have watched the video, which was shown (briefly) on American news and the gist of it was that, Gasp!, Vicky the Jewish broad said, and I quote, "Fuck the EU!".  Oh, the horror.

What was skipped in American news shows was the fact that Vicky there went through a list of Ukrainian politicians and notables and ticked off who was acceptable to America in what position and who was not.

Amazingly! All her predictions came through! And the guy who she had pegged to become the Prime Minister... Welp! Became one!  What a coincidence.

Also, an interesting tidbit is the American ambassador to Ukraine saying: "I think we're in play"... and then they calmly discuss who will be what in the new, freemarket Ukrainian government.

This phone call, made on non hashed, non-secure cell phones, was intercepted by the Russian FSB... I mean private Russian hackers, nothing to do with the FSB...

The interesting thing also to take from this is that this conversation went worldwide, it was shown around the world, and proves not only that American spies are incredible amateurs, but also the fact that it does not matter...



After the popular revolution against that bastard Yanukovytch, who played both sides - Russia and America/"our" elites - for the benefit of Ukraine.

He tried to get the most concessions from both, and went with Russia, as Russia guaranteed multi million dollar loans immediately to the country, as well as the continuation of a VERY favorable pricing for Russian gas, gasoline etc etc.

While all the EU side offered was the promise of "austerity"... and maybe some loans, later.

And the Western media were shocked, shocked!, when Yanukovytch went with option "R", and not option "EU".

This was explained as Russia putting economic pressure on the country (because when a country gives you free money in return for doing something, it is called an "economic pressure" apparently).

Then the popular protests happened, and for months people were in the Maidan Square protesting the Yanukovytch government.

Then somebody - no one knows who - shot both at the protesters AND the police - imagine that!


Skip the vacuous presenter and get to the actual phone conversation between the Estonian Foreign Minister and the EU foreign affairs chief Catherine Ashton.

YOU MUST LISTEN TO THIS, before it is scrubbed like most stuff about Ossetia from the web.

I don't know whether this was again, a non-secure line (Western diplomats and spies are such amateurs, it boggles the mind), and apparently it was again intercepted by the Russian FSB... I mean private citizen hackers.

But the fact that the foreign minister in Estonia, which is a VERY anti-Russian country, spoke about this conspiracy and the fact of the new Ukrainian government not allowing any investigation speaks volumes.

I am shocked that the Estonian minister was so truthful.

Imagine if a Jew was asked to defend verbally Nazi Germany -  same thing just happened here.  Amazing!


And what happened after these snipers shot at both police and the protesters?  Revolution.  Popular, totally unguided, unpaid for from foreign sources, totally spontaneous revolution.

And now the popularly elected... err... appointed, I mean, he was never elected... Mr. Arseniy Yatsenyuk, the people never voted for him, the same one that Victoria Nuland predicted would become Ukraine's top dog (what powers of prophecy this Jewish gal has, a regular modern Madame Nostradamus!).

And his first action?

Bloomberg: Ukraine Premier Promises Economic Overhaul to Win IMF Aid:
“The new Ukrainian government is ready to deliver changes,” Yatsenyuk said in Washington yesterday during a visit that included a meeting with President Barack Obama and Christine Lagarde, managing director of the International Monetary Fund.
“We fully realize that the IMF program is not a sweet candy, but on the other hand, my country desperately needs real reforms to stabilize the Ukrainian economy,” he said at a forum at the Atlantic Council, a research institute.
Things becoming clearer?

No?

Perhaps this article from Forbes, America's preeminent business journal, will clarify things for you:

Washington's Man Yatsenyuk Setting Ukraine Up For Ruin:

Ukraine’s interim prime minister, Arseniy “Yats” Yatsenyuk, may prove to be arsenic to the beleaguered nation.
“Recall the phone exchange between the Ukraine ambassador and Victoria Nuland (Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs) that got leaked out, where she basically said ‘we want Yats in there.’ They like him because he’s pro Western,” says Vladimir Signorelli, president of boutique investment research firm Bretton Woods Research LLC in New Jersey. “Yatsenyuk is the the kind of technocrat you want if you want austerity, with the veneer of professionalism,” Signorelli said. “He’s the type of guy who can hobnob with the European elite. A Mario Monti type: unelected and willing to do the IMFs bidding,” he said.
Mario Monti was a centrist Italian technocrat who passed an austerity package that called for increased taxes, pension reform and measures to fight tax evasion.
Ukraine’s new 450-seat parliament approved the appointment of the former Central Banker Yatsenyuk on Thursday by a vote of 371 to 1. Oddly enough, earlier this month, the pro-Western Yats trailed behind popular opposition leaders such as former heavyweight boxer Viltali Klitschko and the leader of the nationalist, Svoboda Party, Oleh Tyahnybok.
But Yats had friends in high places and while he does not have strong support of the electorate, and would have no chance of winning an election, he is pro-IMF austerity and apparently the bulk of parliament is as well.
Friends in high places? Time to rewatch that Victoria Nuland video again.  This is how "democary", Western style, works.

“Yatsenyuk was saying that what the Greeks did to themselves we are going to do ourselves,” said Signorelli. “He wants to follow the Greek economic model. Who the hell wants to follow that?”
No sane person wants to experience what Greeks are experiencing right now.  Greece is going fascist now, because of EU's austerity punishments on it.

Incidentally, here is how austerity works.

AmericanGoy's Economy Lesson number 5001: Austerity
Say there is a country, lets call it "Elbonia".  This is a poor country, in trouble economically, many people are unemployed, businesses are not starting up.

Enter the IMF, EU and Western Freedom forces... to the rescue!

IMF sez: "Well, you desperately need money for social pensions and what not, so we will give you a minimum amount, a few million dollars, just enough to tidy you over for a month or a quarter.

In return, all you have to do is give up your country to us wholesale - all political and, more importantly, economic decisions will have to be approved by us.  Sounds good?".

Elbonian officials, not being total idiots, say something along the lines of "Urk?".

IMF comes back to the conversation with: "Well, Prime Minister and Parliament members of Elbonia, you DO like your BMW's, your Mercedes, your villas, your swimming pools, your coke and your prostitutes and caviar? Well, if you say "nyet", there will be a popular revolution against you, and you will be maybe shot, maybe not, but all your stuff which you stole will be taken away and given to a new crew, picked by us!".

Elbonia: "Where do we sign!?".

IMF: "Right under the paragraph that says that everything in the country belongs to us, that everything must be privatized - read, sold to us at pennies to the dollar of its true worth, right below the sentence 'I sell my soul to the devil'".

Cue the sound of furiously scratching pens...

Therein endeth the lesson.


Lets continue with the Forbes article:
Also today, Yatsenyuk promised to implement “very unpopular measures” to stabilize the country’s finances. The government said it needs $35 billion to support the country over the next two years. His language in a news report broadcast by Bloomberg today indicates he is heading toward a potentially destabilizing austerity campaign:
“The treasury is empty. We will do everything not to default. If we get the financial support from the IMF, the U.S., we will do it. I’m going to be the most unpopular prime minister in the history of my country,” he said. “But this is the only solution. I would never promise any kind of huge achievements. First and the most important issue is to stabilize the situation.”
Whatever the master sez, I will do it! Cut pensions for babushkas, make them starve, I will do it! It's the only way!

But hark! err, wait!, you say, didn't Russia basically promise to give you money, gas, gasoline and all the shit for free in return for only not joining EU?

You would say that, if you were a rabid freedom hating, commie loving anti-semitic bastard who reads this blog.  Fortunately, most people are beyond such analysis and researching what the fuck is going on, because most of them are in the process of figuring out how they will pay the rent for next month.

It is unclear the kind of measures Yatsenyuk will tolerate, but it appears austerity is the path forward. That includes a regimen of tax increases, interest rate hikes and further currency devaluation.
Obviously, if you are an economist, preferably a Jewish one working in the EU power structure or somewhere close to Washington DC, this makes perfect sense... Otherwise, not so much.

Yanukovych resisted the International Monetary Fund’s demand to raise taxes and devalue the currency. Yatsenyuk doesn’t mind. For economists who think austerity is a disaster, Ukraine is on a path to ruin.
“We saw this in the 90s and what the IMF did to Russia with Yeltsin. They’ll do that to Ukraine,” said Signorelli. Remember Slobodan Milošević in Yugoslavia? After the IMF finished with Yugoslavia it was only a matter of time before the separatist movements gained traction,” he said. “I think things in Ukraine can get really really bad.”



The way to stimulate an economy of a poor country, with a crashed economy, is to make people buy shit.  That is why George Bush 'W' gave us tax breaks; that is why Obama gave us money to buy cars.  You do that by... cutting taxes.  And/or by pumping government money into the private sector and, if that fails, into government projects so that the government employs people so that people have money for working.  That is what FDR did, and what he did is still considered a blueprint of how to deal with a depression/recession.

Whether they work for a private organization (preferred) or a government one, the key is to give them spending money.

For an economy to work, people need to buy shit.  People need spending money for an economy to work.  Full stop.





Think on this.  Fucking think on this.  Common sense, forget what some Jewhead is telling you on TV.




To stimulate the economy, people need to have money so they can afford shit, and then business folks come in and make factories, cafes, cars, restaurants, people from other countries come in and invest because one can make money here... And we have an economic boom.

But the IMF/EU/"our" non-European elite have a totally opposite plan: take money away from people, tax them so they have barely enough not to starve, and then turn money into Zimbabwe dollars i.e. make them worthless.

"Our" EU and IMF Jewish elites (and American Jewish princesses) are telling Greece, Ireland and now Ukraine to increase taxes, make their money worthless, basically to turn those countries into Weimar Germany.

They are doing the opposite of what is needed to help people.




What is the end game of turning countries into Weimar republics?

Dirty Little Secrets Of WWII: The Hidden, Awkward Origins Of World War 2, By Jason Collett:

Hugh Wilson, the American Ambassador in Berlin until 1938, the year before the war broke out, found anti-Semitism in Germany 'understandable'. This was because before the advent of the Nazis, "the stage, the press, medicine and law [were] crowded with Jewsamong the few with money to splurge, a high proportion [were] Jewsthe leaders of the Bolshevist movement in Russia, a movement desperately feared in Germany, were Jews. One could feel the spreading resentment and hatred." (Hugh Wilson: Diplomat between the Wars, Longmans 1941, quoted in Leonard Mosley, Lindbergh, Hodder 1976).

At the end of the First World War, Germany was essentially tricked [see Paul Johnson A History of the Modern World (1983) p24 and H NicholsonPeacemaking 1919 (1933) pp13-16] into paying massive reparations to France and other economic competitors and former belligerent countries in terms of the so-called Treaty of Versailles, thanks to the liberal American President Woodrow Wilson. Germany was declared to be solely responsible for the war, in spite of the fact that 'Germany did not plot a European war, did not want one, and made genuine efforts, though too belated, to avert one.' (Professor Sydney B Fay The Origins of the World War (vol. 2 p 552)).
As a result of these massive enforced financial reparations, by 1923 the situation in Germany became desperate and inflation on an astronomical scale became the only way out for the government. Printing presses were engaged to print money around the clock. In 1921 the exchange rate was 75 marks to the dollar. By 1924 this had become about 5 trillion marks to the dollar. This virtually destroyed the German middle class (Koestler The God that Failed p 28), reducing any bank savings to a virtual zero.
Things becoming clearer yet?

According to Sir Arthur Bryant the British historian (Unfinished Victory (1940 pp. 136-144):
 
'It was the Jews with their international affiliations and their hereditary flair for finance who were best able to seize such opportunities.. They did so with such effect that, even in November 1938, after five years of anti-Semitic legislation and persecution, they still owned, according to the Times correspondent in Berlin, something like a third of the real property in the Reich. Most of it came into their hands during the inflation.. But to those who had lost their all this bewildering transfer seemed a monstrous injustice. After prolonged sufferings they had now been deprived of their last possessions. They saw them pass into the hands of strangers, many of whom had not shared their sacrifices and who cared little or nothing for their national standards and traditions. The Jews obtained a wonderful ascendancy in politics, business and the learned professions (in spite of constituting) less than one percent of the population.
 
The banks, including the Reichsbank and the big private banks, were practically controlled by them. So were the publishing trade, the cinema, the theatres and a large part of the press ­ all the normal means, in fact, by which public opinion in a civilized country is formed.. The largest newspaper combine in the country with a daily circulation of four millions was a Jewish monopoly. Every year it became harder and harder for a gentile to gain or keep a foothold in any privileged occupation.. At this time it was not the 'Aryans' who exercised racial discrimination. It was a discrimination that operated without violence. It was exercised by a minority against a majority. There was no persecution, only elimination.. It was the contrast between the wealth enjoyed ­ and lavishly displayed ­ by aliens of cosmopolitan tastes, and the poverty and misery of native Germans, that has made anti-Semitism so dangerous and ugly a force in the new Europe. Beggars on horseback are seldom popular, least of all with those whom they have just thrown out of the saddle."
Things becoming clearer yet?

Princeton University Press in 1984, Sarah Gordon (Hitler, Germans and the "Jewish Question") essentially confirms what Bryant says. According to her, 'Jews were never a large percentage of the total German population; at no time did they exceed 1% of the population during the years 1871-1933.' But she adds 'Jews were over-represented in business, commerce, and public and private service.. They were especially visible in private banking in Berlin, which in 1923 had 150 private Jewish banks, as opposed to only 11 private non-Jewish banks. They owned 41% of iron and scrap iron firms and 57% of other metal businesses.. Jews were very active in the stock market, particularly in Berlin, where in 1928 they comprised 80% of the leading members of the stock exchange. By 1933, when the Nazis began eliminating Jews from prominent positions, 85% of the brokers on the Berlin Stock exchange were dismissed because of their "race".. At least a quarter of full professors and instructors (at German universities) had Jewish origins. In 1905-6 Jewish students comprised 25% of the law and medical students.. In 1931, 50% of the 234 theatre directors in Germany were Jewish, and in Berlin the number was 80%.. In 1929 it was estimated that the per capita income of Jews in Berlin was twice that of other Berlin residents..' etc etc.
Any similarity of the Weimar Republic situation to what is happening know in our Yoo Ess of Ey is entirely apt, and kudos to you for finally fucking noticing it!

Moar.  Moar.
Edgar Mowrer, Berlin correspondent for the Chicago Daily News, wrote an anti-German tract called Germany Puts the Clock Back (published as a Penguin Special and reprinted five times between December 1937 and April 1938). He nevertheless notes 'In the all-important administration of Prussia, any number of strategic positions came into the hands of Hebrews.. A telephone conversation between three Jews in Ministerial offices could result in the suspension of any periodical or newspaper in the state. The Jews came in Germany to play in politics and administration that same considerable part that they had previously won by open competition in business, trade, banking, the Press, the arts, the sciences and the intellectual and cultural life of the country. And thereby the impression was strengthened that Germany, a country with a mission of its own, had fallen into the hands of foreigners.'
Any similarity to the situation in the Yoo Ess of Ey...
Mowrer says 'No one who lived through the period from 1919 to 1926 is likely to forget the sexual promiscuity that prevailed. Throughout a town like Berlin, hotels and pensions made vast fortunes by letting rooms by the hour or day to baggageless, unregistered guests. Hundreds of cabarets, pleasure resorts and the like served for purposes of getting acquainted and acquiring the proper mood..' (pp. 153-4). Bryant describes throngs of child prostitutes outside the doors of the great Berlin hotels and restaurants. He adds 'Most of them (the night clubs and vice-resorts) were owned and managed by Jews. And it was the Jews.. among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in after years.' (pp. 144-5).
I could write an article on who is who in the porno business, and how come we have thousands, fucking thousands of free, fucking free porno sites on the internet...

Explain to me how it is a good business model to have stored hundreds of thousands of porno movies and bandwith capability to let it be seen by millions of people, for free.

Douglas Reed, Chief Central European correspondent before WWII for the London Times, was profoundly anti-German and anti-Hitler. But nevertheless he reported: 'I watched the Brown Shirts going from shop to shop with paint pots and daubing on the window panes the word "Jew", in dripping red letters. The Kurfürstendamm was to me a revelation. I knew that Jews were prominent in business life, but I did not know that they almost monopolized important branches of it. Germany had one Jew to one hundred gentiles, said the statistics; but the fashionable Kurfürstendamm, according to the dripping red legends, had about one gentile shop to ninety-nine Jewish ones.' (Reed Insanity Fair (1938) p. 152-3).
And more and more and more of the same.

This is what this situation in Ireland, in Greece, in the UK, in USA, is leading to.

By design.

You might say: But Oh Great and Wise AmericanGoy, are the Jews idiots, since we all remember what happened in the Weimar Germany in the 1930's?

And is happening again in Greece:


The answer to that is that yes, the Jews ARE greedy idiots.

But also, have you wondered why the government of the UK's main function is to allow as many 3rd world citizens into the country? And, failing that, to let in as many Eastern Europeans, preferanly Gypsies, in?

And why France has the same policy with regards to the 3rd world i.e. let in any Algerian, Tunisian, Moroccan that wants in?

And Germany and Austria allows all of Capaddocia Turkey in?


And why exactly was Libya's Quackdaffy.... I mean Quadaffi bumped off?

But Oh Great and Wise Amer... you know the drill, the question is how are they related?


Well, right before Quadaffi was bumped off, he promised to do one thing for Europe.

The Guardian: European Union EU keen to strike deal with Muammar Gaddafi on immigration:

The European Union is keen to strike a pact with Muammar Gaddafi to stem the flow of immigrants across the Mediterranean, officials said today, after the Libyan leader put a price tag of €5bn (£4.1bn) a year on the deal.
"There is great scope to develop cooperation with Libya on migration," said Matthew Newman, a commission spokesman. Other officials said three negotiating sessions were expected by the end of the year between Brussels and Tripoli as well as the staging of a summit of EU and African leaders in Libya in November.
In a highly theatrical visit to Italy this week, Gaddafi warned that Europe would turn "black" unless it was more rigorous in turning back immigrants. Libya is a key transit point for illegal migration from Africa to Europe. The Libyan leader said the bill for sealing the crossing routes would be at least €5bn a year.
(snip snip)
Libya is already taking part in three "pilot projects" set up by the EU and Italy on migration, and Tripoli has received almost €20m in EU funding, the European commission said.

He was actually stopping the flow of Arab and blacks into Europe! And the EU was paying him for it!

...And then, of course, he was immediately killed and his country thrown into anarchy, so that no one can control the borders.


For freedom!!!!111

And now the flood is only just beginning, what with the (Israeli sponsored and kickstarted) wars in Syria, Iraq, Libya...

But a confidential internal security report from EU police and border agencies, leaked to the Statewatch whistleblower this week, said 900,000 illegal immigrants were entering the EU every year.
"The risk of illegal migration by north, east and west African nationals to the EU remains high," said the report. "Libya remains a focal point despite recent success in disrupting entry into the EU by this route."
That's a million, mostly 3rd world trash, camp of the saints shit, officially... unofficially... who the fuck knows.

So how do Jews both successfully implement a 'Weimar Republic' so that they can steal everything and lord it over the stupid goyim (that's you and me, bud) without the situation repeating itself into fascism?

It is hard, as the example of Greece shows - desperate people can do some crazy shit, like try to take their country back (the gall! the nerve!).

But in other places it is working gloriously.

Take the United Kingdom, for example.

The Telegraph: Labour wanted mass immigration to make UK more multicultural, says former adviser:

Labour threw open Britain's borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a "truly multicultural" country, a former Government adviser has revealed.

The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and "rub the Right's nose in diversity", according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.
He said Labour's relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to "open up the UK to mass migration" but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its "core working class vote".
As a result, the public argument for immigration concentrated instead on the economic benefits and need for more migrants.
Critics said the revelations showed a "conspiracy" within Government to impose mass immigration for "cynical" political reasons.
Isn't the same thing happening in France? In America? In Sweden? In fact, in EVERY  fucking European White country?

The key sentence is: "Labour's relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to "open up the UK to mass migration" but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its "core working class vote".

Bears reading and rereading, that sentence.

First, this means that it was a conspiracy by the ruling "elite".

Second, it means that this was not something that the people of the country wanted, so it was kept hush hush until it was too late.

In every country, the economic benefits of 3rd world camp of the saints immigrants are touted and discussed as some kind of a sacred truth, ad infinitum.  Because without a 3rd world Congolese, or sullen unemployed Algerian, or sullen, hate-Whitey Mexican who will pay taxes for social services for the rapidly aging White population?

Certainly not White kids growing up into the labour market, because by deliberate policy, only 3rd world "on the dole" people were receiving (and are receiving) benefits, the more children they have the more money they get.

Deliberate policies running in tandem in EVERY fucking White European country - first, promote feminism, career, campaign of laughter at stay at home moms, leading to European people's numbers dwindling and then the opening of the borders to let our replacements in.

He wrote a major speech for Barbara Roche, the then immigration minister, in 2000, which was largely based on drafts of the report.

He said the final published version of the report promoted the labour market case for immigration but unpublished versions contained additional reasons, he said.

He wrote: "Earlier drafts I saw also included a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural.
Multicultural - i.e. no longer European White.  So that England won't be English anymore. Nor Wales Welsh. And the same is happening in Sweden, Norway, France, Spain...

And how does Blair defend his treason?
He defended the policy, saying mass immigration has "enriched" Britain, and made London a more attractive and cosmopolitan place.
Enriched.

London is now "more attractive".


See the "cosmopolitans" in action.

Meanwhile, the riots were of course covered by the ever present government propaganda arm, err, I mean the free media.


Store owner: "I saw 100 to 200 black dudes, rampaging every shop".
Propaganda specialist: "Are you being stereotypical,  are you sure they were black?".
Store owner: "I was there...".
Propaganda specialist: "I AM SURE THEY WEREN'T ALL BLACK.  DOESN'T MAKE A DIFFERENCE".

Whelp!, there you go, free Western press in action!

Best comeback ever by the store owner, being interviewed next to his burned down and destroyed store: "Let me just say that they weren't all black - I was the one White guy there!".


Do people notice?

Yep.  Here's an English woman noticing that she is THE ONLY ENGLISH PERSON on a tram in England.


She is basically hitler, literally, like omg dude.

For committing this crime, for a crime it was, worse than stealing billions of dollars, worse than paedophilia, worse than murdering someone - the crime of noticing and taking action - she was very much punished by the government.

The same one that allowed hordes of 3rd world immigrants and assorted Eastern Euro trash to get in i.e. committed treason against her.

Emma West Croydon tram race rant woman sentenced,















A fifth, yes that’s fifth,  date for the start of Emma West’s trial on criminal charges arising from her complaint about  mass immigration and its effects made on a Croydon tram  in November 2011 has been set  for  9th April
The  delay is plausibly not down to any practical or legal reason,  but the fact that Miss West has done something very unusual by maintaining a plea of Not Guilty throughout her ordeal, despite being imprisoned for two weeks in the nearest there is to a Category A prison in England for women HMP Bronzefield after being refused bail on the bogus grounds that it was “for her own safety” and having the threat of her child being taken away hanging over her.
"Our" elites, who are neither our nor European, are playing hardball.

They play for keeps.
During the time since the original charges, Miss West has been further charged with assaulting two police officers at her home.
More charges.

Also, vee vill take your childrun away from you... for their own good.

They... broke this woman.

So what did she do?

In case you don't want to watch this (horrifying, I know!) video, here's BBC telling us what she did:
The things she said included "you're not English", "none of you are English" and "get back to your own countries".
Am I supposed to laugh or cry at this?  What is it called when I do both at the same time?
Prosecutor Julius Capon said: "She in essence persecuted a number of passengers on the tram, subjecting them to some disgusting racial abuse."
Oh my, the humanity.  Kill this woman immediately!

Wait... strike that.  Let her live... as an example to others.

As a warning to the goyim.

The court heard she was "reeking of alcohol" when she carried out the verbal attack.
Of course! Just like she assaulted the police officers at her home. The police officers were paying her a friendly visit, and she attacked them.  I assume they survived, the poor dears?

Incidentally, using alcohol as an excuse for wrong doing sometimes works in English courts.

The Telegraph: Muslim women not used to drinking walk free after attack on woman:

A gang of Somalian women who repeatedly kicked a young woman in the head walked free from court after a judge heard they were "not used to being drunk" because they were Muslim.

The four women - three sisters and their cousin - were told the charge of actual bodily harm, which carries a maximum sentence of five years, against 22-year-old care worker Rhea Page would normally land them in custody.
However, the judge handed the women suspended sentences after hearing that they were not used to alcohol because their religion does not allow it.
Miss Page said Ambaro Maxamed, 24, Ayan Maxamed, 28, and Hibo Maxamed, 24, and their 28-year-old cousin Ifrah Nur screamed "Kill the white slag" while kicking her in the head as she lay motionless on the ground.
The support worker from Leicester was left "black and blue" with bruises and needed hospital treatment following the attack which came as she walked to a taxi rank with her boyfriend.
Miss Page was left so traumatised by the attack that she lost her job due to repeated absences with stress and flashbacks.
Just like the case of Emma West, THIS IS A LESSON.

So all this is explaining how "our" elites plan to improve on their Weimar plan.  To modernize it.

The case of the country of United Kingdom spotlights the tactics which are in play AFTER the European White society is shocked by deliberate policies of discouraging of European White children AND the influx of untold hordes of 3rd world scum (and, failing that, of Eastern Europeans, the dodgier the better).

Disclaimer: I will now bare my soul.  The Eastern European country I was born in is Poland.  I 100% support this Emma West woman - it is HER COUNTRY which was STOLEN from her.  The reason for the hordes of Poles in London and Ireland is "our" elites running things over there also - I should write an article on how things work in Poland these days.  For starters, there are no jobs, and more importantly, almost nothing, NOTHING is under control of ethnic Polish owners.  Every bank, every major business is... well, you know.  It is a paradise for some, but not for Poles.  Hence the immigration, myself included.

"Our" elites work behind the scenes globally, worldwide, to implement "Tikun Olam" - to make the world a better place (for themselves).

I don't see a bright future for us.

It is either the UK (and Poland) where nothing around us is owned by people like us, people born to that land, generations going back through thousands of years of history, or what actually happened in Weimar Republic in the 1930's and what is happening in Greece right now with the Golden Dawn.

Is there a third way of dealing with this problem?

 Del.icio.us Add to my Technorati Favorites! StumbleUpon

Friday, March 14, 2014

American led NATO exercises in Ukraine are a go

Stars and Stripes: US Army to proceed with planned exercise in Ukraine, March 13, 2014:

Atlas Vision is canceled. But Rapid Trident is still a go.
The status of two annual U.S. Army Europe military exercises that were scheduled for July — one in Russia, one in western Ukraine — is being affected differently by the situation in Ukraine, which has been described as the worst crisis since the end of the Cold War. The fact that the U.S. and its allies chose to go ahead with an exercise in Ukraine while canceling the one in Russia demonstrates Western support for Kiev in its confrontation with Moscow.
However, planning for Rapid Trident 2014 — a large, USAREUR-led multinational exercise scheduled for July — is ongoing, he said.
That exercise, in Lviv, near the Polish border, is to “promote regional stability and security, strengthen partnership capacity, and foster trust while improving interoperability between USAREUR, the land forces of Ukraine, and other (NATO and partner) nations,” according to the USAEUR website.
In addition to USAREUR troops, Rapid Trident 2014 will include units from Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Canada, Georgia, Germany, Moldova, Poland, Romania, the United Kingdom and Ukraine, Westover said. It will feature a combined U.S. and Ukrainian battalion headquarters practicing a peacekeeping operation, he said.  “Exercise planning will continue until we are told otherwise.”
Near the Polish border, BUT on Ukrainian territory.  There is a sense of inertia similar to the way countries  were trapped by events moving on their own volition in Anno Domini 1914...

In response, Russia should do some exercises on the Serb-Kosovo border...

If you have no idea what Kosovo is, it is a Serbian historic core region which was taken away from Serbia by NATO.  The way it was done was that the native Serb population was displaced and outbred by an Albanian population (which came from nearby Albania as economic immigrants), and then, under "protection" of NATO (read - US) troops and airplanes and helicopters and tanks, there was a referendum and the people (read - invading Albanians) have voted to break away from Serbia.

Under the aegis of NATO-American troops, this little scrap of land has become a fulcrum of drug smuggling, human smuggling (Eastern European women kidnapped and shipped for slave-prostitution in Western Europe, Middle East and Israel) and other organized crime activities.

The movie "Taken" with Liam Neeson about women slave traffic was somewhat realistic - it involved an ALBANIAN gang kidnapping White women for a Middle Eastern client...

 Del.icio.us Add to my Technorati Favorites! StumbleUpon

Saturday, March 1, 2014

Israeli militia commander fights to protect Kiev

Delta, a Ukrainian-born former IDF soldier, headed a force of 40 men and women, most of whom are not Jewish, against gov’t forces

February 28, 2014, 9:37 PM

 

From "The Times of Israel" newspaper:

He calls his troops “the Blue Helmets of Maidan,” but brown is the color of the headgear worn by Delta — the nom de guerre of the commander of a Jewish-led militia force that participated in the Ukrainian revolution. Under his helmet, he also wears a kippah.

Delta, a Ukraine-born former soldier in the Israel Defense Forces, spoke to JTA Thursday on condition of anonymity. He explained how he came to use combat skills he acquired in the Shu’alei Shimshon reconnaissance battalion of the Givati infantry brigade to rise through the ranks of Kiev’s street fighters. He has headed a force of 40 men and women — including several fellow IDF veterans — in violent clashes with government forces.
Several Ukrainian Jews, including Rabbi Moshe Azman, one of the country’s claimants to the title of chief rabbi, confirmed Delta’s identity and role in the still-unfinished revolution.
The “Blue Helmets” nickname, a reference to the UN peacekeeping force, stuck after Delta’s unit last month prevented a mob from torching a building occupied by Ukrainian police, he said. “There were dozens of officers inside, surrounded by 1,200 demonstrators who wanted to burn them alive,” he recalled. “We intervened and negotiated their safe passage.”
The problem, he said, was that the officers would not leave without their guns, citing orders. Delta told JTA his unit reasoned with the mob to allow the officers to leave with their guns. “It would have been a massacre, and that was not an option,” he said.
The Blue Helmets comprise 35 men and women who are not Jewish, and who are led by five ex-IDF soldiers, says Delta, an Orthodox Jew in his late 30s who regularly prays at Azman’s Brodsky Synagogue. He declined to speak about his private life.

 

We have special forces soldiers doing what is called a

Force multiplication

Any questions?

 

 

  

 Del.icio.us Add to my Technorati Favorites! StumbleUpon

Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Anonymouse sez

"Thomas Jefferson put a lot of effort into laying a strong legal basis for widespread ownership of family farms in the U.S. It helped make the U.S. different from Latin America where the land tends to wind up in the hands of a handful of families."

This is/was one of the most critical foundations of early modern prosperity imo like the 100 year leases on family farms in England.

.

"Ukraine is currently a really, really poor country, with a GDP per capita about a third of Poland's...But Ukraine has a lot of billionaires"

This goes together.

Option1: 10% rich with 90% of wealth, 90% poor

Option2: 10% rich with 20% of wealth, 90% middle class


In option 1 the velocity of money is very low because the 90% have no disposable income and the rich, although they have vast amounts of disposable income only need to spend small amounts at a time so most sits stagnant in the form of stored wealth.

In option 2 the velocity of money is very fast because the 90% middle class have a lot of disposable income between them and they spend most of it every month. The rich spend about the same as they did in option 1.

The huge increase in the velocity of money in option 2 generates a much higher GDP so even though the rich have only 20% of the total wealth, in absolute terms they are richer than they were in option 1.

The trouble in paradise is that in option 1 the rich having 90% of the wealth - even if in absolute terms it is less than in option 2 - means the rich have 90% of the power whereas in option 2 they only have 20% of the power.

What exists in Ukraine today is where the West is heading because of the oligarchs and their control of the media-politics-finance complex.

 Del.icio.us Add to my Technorati Favorites! StumbleUpon

Monday, February 24, 2014

leftist conservative on isteve sez:

this entire ukrainian crisis is primarily about separatism.

The ukrainian speaking half of Ukraine wants its own nation, to be separate from the russian speaking half of ukraine.

CorpGovMedia is not focusing on this issue of separatism. However National Security Advisor Susan Rice has said that ukraine does not have to split up.

What a surprise. CorpGovMedia is mostly hiding the fact that crisis is about secession, and when the elites finally do admit that fact, they come down on the side against separatism.

The elites always want to keep nations as large as possible.

Why?

I have been saying this for years, and no one listens me. But I will say it again: the elites want as many factions in every nation as possible. Factions kill democracy. The elites want little democracy. The people want lots of democracy. The people want to be with other people like themselves. That is the cradle of democracy--sameness. Homogeneity.

Lack of sameness, heterogeneity, lowers democracy.

The elite want to control the governments. So they like heterogeneity. You may have noticed that here in the USA the elite love multiculturalism and cram it down young white throats in school with an avid ferocity.

The people want to control the gov't. The elite want that control.

The interests of the people and of the elite are opposed.

The elite use factions to keep the people from controlling the gov't.

The elite use factions this way and have been doing so for centuries.

The elite of america over 200 years ago discarded the highly democratic articles of confederation and replaced them with the undemocratic constitution.
The constitution created factions by enlarging the political districts. The rebels in ukraine want to decrease the size of political districts.

The elite everywhere want to keep the ukrainian political districts large. They know that with large political districts they have better control of the gov't and can thus increase corporate profits.

The elite are doing the same thing --faction creation-- in western europe using the EU to create factions and steal democracy.
Enlargement of political districts creates factions-- heterogeneity-- and lowers democracy, allowing increased elite control of the gov't.
Emphasis in bold text is mine.


Another one, on the expansion of NATO HQ in Brussels:

another quasi-governmental organization that enlarges political districts, thus increasing the number of factions therein, thus causing a loss of democracy because enlarged, faction-ridden political entities by their very nature tend to have less well-defined sets of interests as expressed by the populace. Restated, the more diverse the populace within any given organizational entity, then the less well defined the shared, common interests of the population.

When the common interests of the populace are less well defined, the populace is less able to control and hold accountable their elected and non-elected representatives. Therefore, because the representatives are held less accountable in such enlarged, faction-ridden districts, these representatives are thus able to more easily sell out to corporations and rich donors and investors.

The majority faction in such enlarged, faction ridden districts are less able to control it, and the elites thus have more control.

At one end of the spectrum we have the USA, the former soviet union, china, the EU, Nato, the UN. These enlarged political districts/nations/quasi-governmental entities are used by the elites to thwart democracy.

At the other end of the spectrum we have such nations as Iceland. Consider Iceland. Among the western nations you might consider it the best example of democracy available.

What are the outcomes?

Gubbler of the Society of Reformed Chechenistics sez:

Some speak of 'dark nationalism' in Europe, but nationalism is what has defended and saved Europe. Most of the problems were caused by imperialism than by nationalism. If anything, nationalism fought against imperialism.

The real problem of Nazism wasn't nationalism. It was imperialism. It tried to take over non-German lands. Same thing with Sovietism. It ruled over non-Russian lands.
And where were the hot spots prior to WWI? Balkans, and why? Imperialism. It was the clash of Russian imperialism and Austrian imperialism. And Brits sided with the French because Brit imperialism felt threatened by the potential rise of German imperialism as Germans began to work on building a navy of their own.

It was nationalism that kept Poland alive even as it was wiped off the map by Prussian, Austrian, and Russian invasions.
It was nationalism that kept the dream of a free Greece alive during Ottoman rule.

It was nationalism that kept Lithuania, Poland, Estonia, and etc spiritually free even under communist domination of USSR.

Besides, US supported Albanian nationalism in Kosovo and Kurdish nationalism in northern Iraq after the invasion. And US also supported Kuwaiti nationalism against Iraqi imperialism. No talk of 'dark nationalism' there.

Imperialism is aggressive outside the borders. Nationalism is defensive within borders. If Nazis had remained truly nationalist and remained within their borders, there would have been no trouble.

So, we need to allow the nationalist energies to work themselves out in Ukraine, which is a imperialist creation--like former Yugoslavia--than a viable nation. It's essentially two nations within one nation. It's best off breaking in two.

Of course, Jews don't like goy nationalism even when it's not imperialist. If anything, Jews prefer goy imperialism(as long as it's not overtly anti-Jewish)over goy nationalism. Goy imperialism leads to diversity, and that makes Jews one of the many peoples. But goy nationalism--even when defensive and non-aggressive against other nations--emphasizes unity of the homogeneous gentile community and that means Jews are made to feel as the Other.

Jews feel safer in a diverse world where goyim are divided. So, Jews hate all nationalism except for the Jewish kind in Israel.
Jews are especially allergic to European/Western nationalism since Jewish power and wealth are concentrated in those areas.
Jews care less about nationalism in Asia, Africa, and Arab world since Jewish wealth is not invested there. If anything, Jews love to stoke nationalist, sectarian, and ethnic tensions in the Middle East to make Muslim fight Muslim.

 Del.icio.us Add to my Technorati Favorites! StumbleUpon