Monday, June 9, 2008

Bilderberg 2008 and AIPAC 2008 compared: Obama and Hillary attend Bilderberg

Apart from the AIPAC meeting, attended by all 3 American presidential hopefuls (Obama, Clinton, McCain) and over 300 Congress people, and not much about it on any networks - other than Comedy Central's serving news as a joke (irony is when the comedy news show has more news and better analysis of today's issues than 24 hour cable news networks).

No, I Can't! Obama and The Israeli Lobby by Uri Avnery is a nice article with some tasty quotables:

AFTER MONTHS of a tough and bitter race, a merciless struggle, Barack Obama has defeated his formidable opponent, Hillary Clinton. He has wrought a miracle: for the first time in history a black person has become a credible candidate for the presidency of the most powerful country in the world.

And what was the first thing he did after his astounding victory? He ran to the conference of the Israel lobby, AIPAC, and made a speech that broke all records for obsequiousness and fawning.

That is shocking enough. Even more shocking is the fact that nobody was shocked.

"And what was the first thing he did after his astounding victory? He ran to the conference of the Israel lobby, AIPAC, and made a speech that broke all records for obsequiousness and fawning.

That is shocking enough. Even more shocking is the fact that nobody was shocked."
Even more shocking, is that no one apart from people in the know, in the news business and Congressional employees did not notice.

At least in the USA.

All the three presidential hopefuls made speeches, trying to outdo each other in flattery. 300 Senators and Members of Congress crowded the hallways. Everybody who wants to be elected or reelected to any office, indeed everybody who has any political ambitions at all, came to see and be seen.

All three presidential candidates, and the majority of Congress people came to AIPAC, the American ISRAELI Political Action Committee, and this has almost no coverage on American TV!

Obama, 12 hours after winning the democratic presidential nomination, rushed to AIPAC's conference and made the most kiss-Israeli-ass speech ever given by an American politician, never mind a future president - and it is a non-issue, not newsworthy!

The world looked on and was filled with wonderment. The Israeli media were ecstatic. In all the world's capitals the events were followed closely and conclusions were drawn. All the Arab media reported on them extensively. Aljazeera devoted an hour to a discussion of the phenomenon.

The most extreme conclusions of professors John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt were confirmed in their entirety.

The most extreme conclusions of professors John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt were confirmed in their entirety? The conclusions that a foreign country has such a powerful lobby that it influences American foreign policy?

That the lobby is so powerful that presidential nominees, the majority of Congress, all come to demonstrate American politicians devotion to a foreign country? And their willingness to give more support, more money, more American kids in US Army uniforms to sacrifice for the cause of a foreign country?

But at least this was somewhat covered on American TV (the afore mentioned Daily Show on Comedy Central).

But right now, there was another important conference going on (just ended). It is the Bilderberg group that was meeting. And there is none, zero, zilch mention of it on American TV.

What is the Bilderberg group?

Wikipedia on Bilderberg:
The Bilderberg Group, Bilderberg conference, or Bilderberg Club is an unofficial annual invitation-only conference of around 130 guests, most of whom are persons of influence in the fields of business, media and politics.

The elite group meets annually at luxury hotels or resorts throughout the world — normally in Europe — and once every four years in the United States or Canada


Some of the Western world's leading financiers and foreign policy strategists attend Bilderberg. Donald Rumsfeld is an active Bilderberger, as is Peter Sutherland from Ireland, a former European Union commissioner and chairman of Goldman Sachs and of British Petroleum. Rumsfeld and Sutherland served together in 2000 on the board of the Swedish/Swiss engineering company ABB. Former U.S. Deputy Defense Secretary and former World Bank head Paul Wolfowitz is also a member. The group's current chairman is Etienne Davignon, the Belgian businessman and politician.


But that is Wikipedia.

How do we know that a meeting was taking place at all?

Simple - the Bilderberg group released a press release stating that it is meeting - link is here, from the yahoo.biz Business Wire.
CHANTILLY, Va.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The 56th Bilderberg Meeting will be held in Chantilly, Virginia, USA 5 – 8 June 2008. The Conference will deal mainly with a nuclear free world, cyber terrorism, Africa, Russia, finance, protectionism, US-EU relations, Afghanistan and Pakistan, Islam and Iran. Approximately 140 participants will attend, of whom about two-thirds come from Europe and the balance from North America. About one-third is from government and politics, and two-thirds are from finance, industry, labor, education and communications. The meeting is private in order to encourage frank and open discussion.

So the meeting has just ended.

The meeting tackled the topics of 'nuclear free world' (aka how to disarm Iran and allow Israel to keep its nuclear arsenal), 'cyber terrorism' (aka this freedom of expression on the net is starting to really bother us, your overlords), Africa (how to better exploit its natural resources while starving the people), Russia (Putin did not allow Jewish bankers to dominate Russia after Yeltsin - naughty!), finance (money is good), protectionism (or how to destroy nation states), Islam and Iran (lets bomb Iran).

I am only half joking in my snide remarks in the parentheses.

So, we know from the official release that the Bilderberg group did just meet, on American soil.

Lets google.

The hits I get are from various blogs, and most notably from prisonplanet.com

Hmm, curious.
Lets go to Reuters.com:
No results were found.
Your search for 'Bilderberg ' produced 0 results.


OK..... strange.

Lets go to CNN and search for Bilderberg:

We get Wikipedia, prisonplanet.com and blogs.

Oh wait, there is a CNN article on the Bilderberg... oh, it is from 2003.

The people who control the world: Jon Ronson goes looking for 'Them'.
(CNN) -- Every generation gets its world-controlling cabal.

The Middle Ages had the Knights Templar. The 18th century had the Masons and the Illuminati.

Our modern age has golf-playing businessmen and 12-foot lizard-men. Or so Jon Ronson was led to believe.

Ah it is soooooooooo funny. You see, the guy writing this article is a comedian. And, haha, goodness, every generation gets its world-controlling cabal (I would think it is much more a very VERY recent phenomena, but I digress).

And that business men playing golf with lizardmen - genius!

Obviously, everybody who even goes on CNN and searches for 'Bilderberg' deserves this scatological article. Beacause, haha, there is nothing to see, you conspiracy nutter!

FOX "news"...
One story, here:
HUME: Well, the politicians laugh it off, and if you ask anybody in a position of authority in Washington about the idea that there is a plan well underway to create a North American Union along the lines of the European Union, which would be compose, among other things, of a great big superhighway system that would connect all three countries.

(snip)

KRAUTHAMMER: I love this stuff, because if you ever doubt your own sanity, all you have to do is read this stuff and you know that you are OK.

Part of this great conspiracy is recent evidence that the governor of Texas, who is a Republican, who supports this highway from Laredo into Oklahoma, was recently at the Bilderberg conference, which is, supposedly, one of these trilateral conferences involving financiers who want to globalize the world and pull strings.

"I love this stuff, because if you ever doubt your own sanity, all you have to do is read this stuff and you know that you are OK."

Haha, Charles Krauthammer, one of the people who was instrumental into involving America in its quagmire in Iraq on behalf of Israeli interests, calls anybody who questions the North American Union a kook, a nutter, and if you ask questions, you are insane.

"Part of this great conspiracy is recent evidence that the governor of Texas, who is a Republican, who supports this highway from Laredo into Oklahoma, was recently at the Bilderberg conference, which is, supposedly, one of these trilateral conferences involving financiers who want to globalize the world and pull strings."


Yes, yes, my goodness, the Bilderberg conference is, supposedly, one of these trilateral conferences involving financiers who want to globalize the world and pull strings - the whole idea of that is just laughable, haha, only troofers and insane people would believe that, haha, hee hee, smirk smirk.

Lets go to ABC News webpage and search for our favorite 'B' word.

We get one hit, one lousy story:
from an ABC blog, no less...
Bill Clinton: All These 'Paranoid' People 'Scream at Me Everywhere'

The young man began screaming at the President about going to the Bilderberg Group meeting in 1991, when he was a candidate for President. He was shouting "1991 Bilderberg" repeatedly to get Clinton's attention and implying that discussions there led to unfair trade policies like NAFTA.
(snip)
"What'd you say? You'll go what? Yeah what about it? Wait - wait -wait," Bill Clinton said as the man interrupted him and the crowd booed the man. "Look, this is the deal folks. All these people that are paranoid about the world come and scream at me everywhere."

Eventually Clinton was able to answer.

"You said you would go if I answered the question. Alright so here's the answer," Bill Clinton said. "I happened to be in Europe then on my way to Russia. I was invited to Bilderberg by Vern Jordan, a friend of mine and a genuine hero of the civil rights movement. And to the best of my knowledge NAFTA was not discussed by anybody in my presence. I was talking to people who happen to be from Europe who did not give a rip about NAFTA."

The one story about Bilderberg involves a young man screaming at president Clinton. And, riiiiight, Bill just happened to be invited to a Bilderberg meeting, on a whim. He didn't plan to attend and be in Europe for it - it was the other way around - he was in Europe, strolling around some city or other, and then he gets invited.

Surprise!

This story is from March 12, 2008.

Do you notice one thing here?

Of course you do.

The Bilderberg conference happened just now, has just ended yesterday, according to the press release in "Chantilly, Virginia, USA 5 – 8 June 2008".

And on CNN, ABC, FOX and even the great Reuters, we get nada, zilch, zip. The search of these web pages brings back either nothing, or links to blogs, or, at the very worst, articles that insult my intelligence.

The Bilderberg conference just ended yesterday, and there is absolutely, positively NO mention of it in the media here in the USA.

Perhaps the conference is unimportant, perhaps the attendees are not important, perhaps this is not news worthy?

But even going by the ABC article, Bill Clinton, attended a previous conference. In 1991. He admitted it while talking to the crowd in 2008, to answer a heckler's shouts.

Bill Clinton attended Bilderberg group meeting in 1991.

He was a United States president from January 20, 1993 to January 20, 2001.

Now, linking these two sets of dates together: Bill Clinton attending Bilderberg in 1991, and Bill Clinton becoming an American president on January 20, 1993 is useless, and proves nothing.

Simply a coincidence, just like it was by a coincidence that Bill Clinton happened to be in Europe, and by chance was invited to a Bilderberg meeting.

From the ABC article:
Clinton finished: "I had a very good time talking to those Europeans about European affairs and what was happening in Russia. But I was not somehow polluted by it into sacrificing America's economic interest".

Of course Bill, we believe you. You have such an awesome record of speaking the truth, always. America was not discussed at that particular meeting, and it's not like you were invited to see if you would be acceptable to the world's elite as America's next president.

It was all a gigantic coincidence...

So, having established that Bill Clinton himself attended a Bilderberg meeting, we can (donning our Sherlock Holmes caps) deduce that perhaps, just perhaps this whole 'B'-word thing is important.

I want to see just how important - I want to discover who the attendees were at the conference that just ended June 9, 2008.

Lets google....

Hmm, curious but I am no longer surprised, no official media come up.
Infowars, prisonplanet, blogs, blogs and more blogs.

No ABC, no CNN, no FOX, no Reuters.

Obviously this, the 2008 edition, of Bilderberg group, is not newsworthy and American people need not be bothered with it... Just like in 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997.... etc etc etc etc etc etc.

So, lets see who was invited to the 2008 world elite schmooze fest.

Unfortunately, since there are no mainstream media sources on this, I will have to use (shudder, shock, fear!) unofficial sources - like blogs (egad! they are unreliable, unlike ABC, CNN, FOX and Reuters).

Lets go to liveleak.com:
Bilderberg Attendee List 2008
Chantilly, Virginia, USA
5-8 June 2008

CURRENT LIST OF PARTICIPANTS (I show you only a few - remember, there are around 130 guests or so, according to Wikipedia):

USA Rockefeller, David Former Chairman, Chase Manhattan Bank

USA Kissinger, Henry A. Chairman, Kissinger Associates, Inc.

USA Bernanke, Ben S. Chairman, Board of Governors, Federal Reserve System

USA Perle, Richard N. Resident Fellow, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research (listed as USA, should be Israel)

USA Wolfowitz, Paul Visiting Scholar, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

USA Rice, Condoleezza Secretary of State

INT Zoellick, Robert B. President, The World Bank Group

DEU Ackermann, Josef Chairman of the Management Board and the Group Executive Committee, Deutsche Bank AG

USA Alexander, Keith B. Director, National Security Agency

INT Almunia, Joaquín Commissioner, European Commission

NLD Balkenende, Jan Peter Prime Minister (Netherlands)

GBR Clarke, Kenneth Member of Parliament

ITA Draghi, Mario Governor, Banca d'Italia

USA Farah, Martha J. Director, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience (I thought that THIS one is very VERY interesting)

USA Feldstein, Martin S. President and CEO, National Bureau of Economic Research

USA Ford, Jr., Harold E. Vice Chairman, Merill Lynch & Co., Inc.

USA Graham, Donald E. Chairman and CEO, The Washington Post Company

FRA Jouyet, Jean-Pierre Minister of European Affairs

NLD Netherlands, H.M. the Queen of the (Queen of the Netherlands).

ESP Spain, H.M. the Queen of (Queen of Spain)

There are many many more. From Europe and USA.

Interestingly, there is also this cbsnews.com blog report (shocking, that the actual interesting news are on blogs these days, even from mainstream media):

Barack Obama took the meaning of “secret meeting” to a different level last night, after he slipped away from the traveling press in order to meet with Hillary Clinton. While it is not uncommon for a presidential candidate and for the president to have private meetings, it is uncommon for those meetings to be as secretive and misleading as this one turned out to be.

The controversy began to develop after a campaign rally in Bristow, Virginia, when the press was whisked away to Dulles Airport outside of Washington, D.C., to board a flight to Chicago. According to campaign staffers, Obama had scheduled interviews with local Chicago television reporters and would meet up at the airport shortly. After waiting for Obama for over an hour, the situation on the plane quickly went from tiresome to alarming once the pilot informed the press that the doors had been locked and the plane was about to take off.

Now, this is worth it I promise.

Reread the last paragraph, from the "The controversy began to develop".
Some highlights:
"the press was whisked away to Dulles Airport outside of Washington, D.C., to board a flight to Chicago".

"Obama had scheduled interviews with local Chicago television reporters and would meet up at the airport shortly".

"After waiting for Obama for over an hour, the situation on the plane quickly went from tiresome to alarming once the pilot informed the press that the doors had been locked and the plane was about to take off."


Kidnapping reporters is normal for a democracy, for a country like... say... Zimbabwe. But in the United States of America?

Article on the CBS blog continues:
"As the plane rolled down the tarmac, the press quickly realized that Obama had never boarded the flight and we had all been duped."

"Minutes later, communications director Robert Gibbs casually informed the press that Obama had stayed behind in Washington for “meetings”, without specifying who the meetings were with. As we began to frantically call our assignment desks to alert them that the presumptive Democratic nominee was running free in Washington, the plane took off for Chicago, leaving us trapped on a plane."

Reread the last one.

The plane's doors were LOCKED, and the reporters were NOT ALLOWED to leave.

Gibbs failed to explain why the press was fooled into believing that Obama would be on the flight to Chicago and why we were not given the chance to de-plane once we learned that Obama would be staying in Washington. He simply said, with a mischievous grin, “We could have sat on the runway for a couple of hours so we decided to go."


Again, situations like that are normal... in Mugabe's Zimbabwe, in Stalin's Russia, in Mao's China... but in America?!

“We could have sat on the runway for a couple of hours so we decided to go." (so that you couldn't leave).

This is not a misunderstanding, this is not a mistake...
This is kidnapping.

Article ends with:
Upon landing in Chicago, Gibbs informed the weary travelers that Obama had indeed met with Clinton as part of the end of the primary process. Details surrounding the meeting were not released, nor was the location disclosed. Shortly thereafter, both campaigns released the following statement:

“Senator Clinton and Senator Obama met tonight and had a productive discussion about the important work that needs to be done to succeed in November.”

Ahh, nothing to see here, Americans.

Obama just wanted privacy for his meeting with Hillary, because the pesky press would ... well, what exactly?

Report the news that Clinton and Obama met, which was reported anyway?

What the fuck is going on here?!

When the plane with the kidnapped reporters landed, "Gibbs informed the weary travelers that Obama had indeed met with Clinton as part of the end of the primary process. Details surrounding the meeting were not released, nor was the location disclosed."

Why couldn't the press just be informed of this entirely normal fact, an official/unofficial meeting between two politicians from the same party, perhaps to discuss Hillary's chances of becoming a vice president.

There is nothing earth shattering here - so why the fucking circus, why kidnap the reporters, why why WHY.

Something stinks.

Look at the dates.

Look at the location Obama was in.

Obama's operatives duping the press happened June 5 / June 6, at the Dulles International Airport in Virginia.

During the ongoing Bilderberg conference, which was taking place in Chantilly, Virginia.

And looking at the homepage for the Dulles International Airport, we see:
"Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) is located in Chantilly, VA on 12,000 acres of land 26 miles from downtown Washington, DC."


This is too easy.

Obviously, this is all a gigantic, unbelievable coincidence, and suggesting anything else will make one a target of snide remarks in polite company who get their news from television.


Dare I go there?
But but but... Alex Jones is insane, a troofer, and a certified nut!

Just for the hell of it, lets go to his page and see what he thinks:
What's New at Bilderberg 2008?:
here have been rumors circulating that Obama and Hillary Clinton may have attended the conference Thursday night. News outlets say they were meeting somewhere in Virginia in that area under closed doors (including the private meeting announced by the mainstream). Chantilly is only a few miles from Dulles International Airport where Obama's press was duped. Obama's/Hillary's campaign office would not confirm/deny they visited Bilderberg.

"Chantilly is only a few miles from Dulles International Airport where Obama's press was duped."

This is Dulles, Virginia, by the by, NOT Dulles Texas...

So Obama and Clinton were a few miles away from the Bilderberg meeting in Chantilly, Virginia.

Now, and only now, this whole kidnapping of the American press by Obama's people, locking the doors on a plane and then taking off without letting anybody get out, only now it starts to make sense.

After all, Obama meeting with Hillary in an official/unofficial meeting to discuss the presidential campaign and her chances of becoming a vice president under Obama is not earth shattering, nor anything particularly abnormal.

Just politics as usual.

Hillary and Obama attending the secretive Bilderberg meeting, now THAT would be intreresting...

Of course, that never happened...

So, lets sum up.
A secretive conference of various world leaders in various fields (presidents, ministers, CEO's, scientists, media barons and influential media personalities) takes place every year, and is not reported in the American media.

This year, it took place in Chantilly, Virginia, USA 5 – 8 June 2008.

In Virginia.

In USA.

Just ended yesterday.

Attended by, among other people, these notables:

USA Rockefeller, David Former Chairman, Chase Manhattan Bank

USA Kissinger, Henry A. Chairman, Kissinger Associates, Inc.

USA Bernanke, Ben S. Chairman, Board of Governors, Federal Reserve System

USA Perle, Richard N. Resident Fellow, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research (listed as USA, should be Israel)

USA Wolfowitz, Paul Visiting Scholar, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

USA Rice, Condoleezza Secretary of State

INT Zoellick, Robert B. President, The World Bank Group.

Heavy hitters, movers and shakers on the international arena.

Not newsworthy, not reported in any US media, no articles, no mention TV, newspapers, radio...

The USA's federal reserve chairman, and Kissinger, and the president of the World Bank, just happened by chance to take a few days vacation in America, alongside about 130 of their bankers, presidents, CEO's, media moguls, scientists closest friends.

And, as a practical joke, reporters whose sole job is to follow Obama and report on everything he does are kidnapped, put on a plane, all doors locked, the plane then takes off and, despite protests of the reporters on board, flies away...

Haha, just a practical joke, entirely normal in.... Mugabe's Zimbabwe... in Soviet Union... in Castro's Cuba.... in America.


Now, people in this country will continue to watch their TV "news", never go on the internet, oblivious to all, all the while hearing reports on TV denigrating blogs, "troofers", "tin foil hat wearing conspiracy theorists" (alongside the obligatory smirks and forced laughter by the pundits on TV and radio).

People in this country will choose to remain ignorant, to not question, to look at Obama, the annointed one, and hope that his bullshit speeches about change actually mean something.

People in this country will believe that the system we have running this country (and indeed the world) is some sort of an imperfect democracy, where their votes and their opinions mean something.

It is best to leave them to their illusions.

Because the more you know, the more you start thinking about it, the more distraught you become.

And then the realization hits you - there is nothing you, the ordinary Joe Schmoe, citizen of America or European Union, can do about it.

In the brave new world to come, you don't count.

Remember my mention of Martha J. Farah being an interesting choice to attend the 2008 Bilderberg meeting?

She stands out from all the politicians, CEO's and media barons because she is a scientist.

Martha J. Farah webpage:
Walter H. Annenberg Professor of Natural Sciences
Director, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience
University of Pennsylvania

Much of my career has been devoted to understanding the mechanisms of vision, memory, and executive function in the human brain. In recent years I have shifted my research focus to a new set of issues that lie at the interface between cognitive neuroscience and "the real world."

These new issues of interest to me include the effects of socioeconomic adversity on children's brain development and emerging social and ethical issues in neuroscience ("neuroethics"). In addition, some very talented students and postdocs have pulled me into their investigations of other topics, including decision making, mood regulation and neurogenetics.


"understanding the mechanisms of vision, memory, and executive function in the human brain"

"shifted my research focus to a new set of issues that lie at the interface between cognitive neuroscience and 'the real world.'"

"the effects of socioeconomic adversity on children's brain development and emerging social and ethical issues in neuroscience ("neuroethics")"

"investigations of other topics including decision making, mood regulation and neurogenetics"


I realize I am blowing your mind here.

Usually, I stay away from what might be considered "tin foil conspiracy" stuff.

But fuck it, I call it as I see it. And I have no pressure from advertisers, nor an editor who gets his marching orders (indirectly) from the folks meeting at Chantilly, Virginia.

And don't worry, this woman was surely not invited into the 'B'-word group meeting for the world's elite to explore their options re: mind control and mass manipulation.

I mean, all they did was ask her a few questions, that's all...

Besides, ordinary media does a superb job of staying on message and molding opinions in the so called world's "democracies", in USA and Europe. No need to get too... scientific... about controlling the masses.

Of course, it is entirely possible that this woman was invited just to talk about cloning... and that will be the possible argument that the naysayers will bring as they will write their scathing, dismissing comments and beat their chests, secure in their ignorance.

After all, she is an expert in neuroethics...

Except that neuroscience is NOT about cloning.
Wikipedia:
Neuroscience is a field that is devoted to the scientific study of the nervous system. Such studies span the structure, function, evolutionary history, development, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, pharmacology, informatics, computational neuroscience and pathology of the nervous system. Traditionally it is seen as a branch of biological sciences. However, recently there has been a surge in the convergence of interest from many allied disciplines, including cognitive and neuro-psychology, computer science, statistics, physics, and medicine. The scope of neuroscience has now broadened to include any systematic scientific experimental and theoretical investigation of the central and peripheral nervous system of biological organisms.

"The scope of neuroscience has now broadened to include any systematic scientific experimental and theoretical investigation of the central and peripheral nervous system of biological organisms".

The study of the human brain.

The study of what makes us, humans, tick.

And on the optimistic thought that the world elite are slowly, gingerly exploring the mind control topic seriously now, I bid you pleasant dreams and say good night...

Bonus Material: Debunked?
CNN: Obama, Clinton hold talks in Feinstein's living room.

This is the official story now.

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton met privately Thursday night at the Washington home of Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a key supporter of Clinton's presidential campaign, Feinstein said Friday.

She left them in her living room with nothing other than water and comfortable chairs for what she called a positive meeting. No one else was in the room, and no one is giving details of what was discussed.

"They talked. I went upstairs and did my work," Feinstein said Friday. "They called me when it was over. I came down and said, 'Good night, everybody; I hope you had a good meeting.'

"They were laughing, and that was it."

The meeting began at 9 p.m. and lasted about an hour, Feinstein said.
(snip)
On Thursday, reporters on Obama's press plane learned that the candidate was not aboard when it departed Virginia, where he had been campaigning. Aides said staff members had "scheduled him some meetings" in Washington.


Interesting.

If this is true, WHY the whole circus and why the whole hush hush lets play Mission Impossible scenario (cue the MI music)?

One thing I get out of this official narrative now is this:
"On Thursday, reporters on Obama's press plane learned that the candidate was not aboard when it departed Virginia, where he had been campaigning. Aides said staff members had "scheduled him some meetings" in Washington."

Meetings... plural.

And also this:
"The meeting began at 9 p.m. and lasted about an hour, Feinstein said."

Plenty of time for other meetings, if any. An hour is not a long time.

How long was Obama's "freedom" from TV reporters anyway?

Watched the Daily Show tonight (I know - talk about one's media sources) and the curious thing I noticed Jon say is that, as he was running the news footage of Feinstein's house, he mentioned that no one saw either Obama or Clinton enter or leave the house.

He even made a joke about it (at Bill Clinton's expense).

I find it hard to believe that a horde of reporters, who surrounded Feinstein's house, whose sole job was to get a photo, any photo, blurry or not, of either Obama, Clinton or better yet both together anywhere NEAR Feinstein's house would fail to do so.

After all, neither Clinton or Obama are that hard to miss.

The whole Chantilly, VA sequence is amazing and would is more than an astronomical coincidence.


It's this:
Look at the dates.

Look at the location Obama was in.

Obama's operatives duping the press happened June 5 / June 6, at the Dulles International Airport in Virginia.

During the ongoing Bilderberg conference, which was taking place in Chantilly, Virginia.

And looking at the homepage for the Dulles International Airport, we see:
"Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) is located in Chantilly, VA on 12,000 acres of land 26 miles from downtown Washington, DC."


vs. this:
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton met privately Thursday night at the Washington home of Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a key supporter of Clinton's presidential campaign, Feinstein said Friday.

She left them in her living room with nothing other than water and comfortable chairs for what she called a positive meeting. No one else was in the room, and no one is giving details of what was discussed.

"They talked. I went upstairs and did my work," Feinstein said Friday. "They called me when it was over. I came down and said, 'Good night, everybody; I hope you had a good meeting.'

"They were laughing, and that was it."

The meeting began at 9 p.m. and lasted about an hour, Feinstein said.

So, take from this what you will.

advanced web statistics

 Del.icio.us Add to my Technorati Favorites! StumbleUpon

16 comments:

Greg Bacon said...

This article is rather long, so only copied and pasted part of it, but towards the end, it lists the Bilderberg Group members in 2007.

Oh for a free and active press in America.

'High priests of globalization' in Istanbul

Thursday, May 31, 2007

Some call it "the multinational government", some call it the "elite club which shapes world policies" while others say it essentially "fixes" the world's fate. It literally breeds conspiracy theories all around the world with its secrecy, while participants say it is only a private gathering that should be respected.

Whatever it is, the mighty Bilderberg is at our door: The "high priests of globalization," as Will Hutton from The Observer once famously put it, begin their ultra-secretive annual meeting today in Istanbul. While the international media's silence gives rise to yet more conspiracy theories, the Turkish media is going nuts about it: from mass-circulation dailies to well-known weeklies, the media is Bilderberg-busy nowadays. Daily Vatan calls it "the most secretive meeting in the world," announcing: "Bilderberg in Istanbul." Weekly Aktüel says the "multinational government" is here to determine the fate of the world. It seems the hype will continue until the "high priests" end their Istanbul meeting on Sunday.

For those who have not heard about it yet, the Bilderberg Group is an "unofficial annual invitation-only conference of around 130 guests" (Wikipedia), influential, powerful figures from the realms of economy, media and politics. The name comes from their first meeting in 1954, which was held in the Hotel de Bilderberg in Oosterbeek, Netherlands. As the date signals, Bilderberg is a creation of the Cold War. The idea came from Joseph Retinger, who was concerned about the growth of anti-Americanism in Western Europe at the time. So, Bilderberg, just like other organizations like NATO, aimed at strengthening the "unity of the West" against the "communist threat."

With the collapse of the Warsaw Pact, the group focused on enhancing the American-led globalization. But then, the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks in New York and Washington practically resulted in another focus, which one might call the relation between "civilizations."

Thus, after the first gathering in Istanbul (1959) and the second one in İzmir (1975), a third gathering in Turkey, widely regarded as a “bridge” between the East and the West, seems appropriate.

People that run the world

If one aspect of Bilderberg that irks many is its secrecy, another one is the identity of its participants. Looking at the list of regular "Bilderbergers," one cannot but think that these are really "the people that run the world". Veterans like Henry Kissinger, David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski are joined every year by newcomers such as former U.S. President Bill Clinton, soon-to-be-former-PM Tony Blair, NATO Secretary-General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, former Pentagon adviser Richard Perle and countless others. Every year, the list also includes important "media people" from influential outlets such as The Financial Times, Washington Post, The Economist, The Times, Le Figaro and Die Zeit. The picture becomes complete with CEOs from the world's biggest companies such as Coca-Cola, Fiat, Suez-Tractebel, Royal Dutch Shell and British Petroleum............

BILDERBERG 2007 INVITED GUESTS

(According to www.bilderberg.org)

Ali Babacan, Minister of Economic Affairs (Turkey)

Kemal Derviş, Administrator, UNDP (Turkey)

Mustafa V. Koç, Chairman, Koç Holding A.Ş. (Turkey)

Fehmi Koru, Senior Writer, Yeni Şafak (Turkey)

George Alogoskoufis, Minister of Economy and Finance (Greece)

Edward Balls, Economic Secretary to the Treasury (UK)

Francisco Pinto Balsemão, Chairman and CEO, IMPRESA, S.G.P.S.; Former Prime Minister (Portugal)

José M. Durão Barroso, President, European Commission (Portugal/International)

Franco Bernabé, Vice Chairman, Rothschild Europe (Italy)

Nicolas Beytout, Editor-in-Chief, Le Figaro (France)

Carl Bildt, Former Prime Minister (Sweden)

Hubert Burda, Publisher and CEO, Hubert Burda Media Holding (Belgium)

Philippe Camus, CEO, EADS (France)

http://www.turkishdailynews.com.tr/article.php?enewsid=74608

Anonymous said...

AG,

That whole post is old news to me. Im not trying to be offensive to you, but Ive been griping for the past few years online about the uncomfortable situation of having so many of the world's central bankers, businesspersons in manufacture and real estate, media barons, and opinion makers all get to meet in Bilderberger meetings and Trilateral Commission Confrences underwritten usually by David Rockefeller, and NOT TELLING ANYONE ON EARTH WHAT THEY ARE DISCUSSING.

AG,
If there was a "football players summit" where five star players of every NFL team met in Kansas City each year behind closed doors, allowing no reporters in----and all the players refused to discuss the topics covered, THE MEDIA WOULD GO BEZERK with accusations that games were being fixed, and the players though dummy bettors on their behalf, were making a fortune in offshore casinos. Each team would only have to throw one game a year to a 8 point or more underdog by having one quarterback throw two extra "gimme" interceptions, and one running back cough up a couple of stupid fumbles..................and voilia, every player who put a million down on each game they were supposed to win would probably walk away 10 million dollars richer---more than they make in a year. The media would go bezerk..........

That is a piss-ant entertainment SPORT for Chrissakes. These are the most powerful people in the world, who control investment, DIS-investment, media themes and memes, entertainment, interest rates, and the money supply, and are the controllers of at least a third of campaign contributions to various polititians either directly or indirectly. These are the movers and shakers of the football game of LIFE on this planet. And the media patently refuses to let you know that they get together at all.................this is more than just odd, its terrifying that a "star chamber" can be ACTING IN COLLUSION behind the scenes, and we just take it in the ass, ur, um, hmmm........accept it like this.


Here is the Israeli "game plan" as I see it......instead of a two state solution with walls seperating the states, instead of letting the Palestinians immigrate to anywhere on earth that will have them (the best idea for peace as the Israeli's are never gonna stop bullying them), what we have is a situation where Israel can deliberately provoke West Bank and Gaza and Southern Lebanon and Southern Syrian Rage whenever the want to, and get a "terrorist" response. Israel then can use the terrorist response as an exucse for aggression on their own part and land-grabbing on their own part.



Let me summarize it like this----If you had a mischevious little brother who liked seeing Daddy kick your ass, all he has to do is spit in your face. When you belt him one across the chops, he runs and tells mamma. Mamma tells daddy about his busted lip. Daddy beats your ass good. The little pest can simply deny spitting in your face, and indeed can say that you spit in his face because he controls the media (talks to your parents first in this situation).
Israel, and the neocons, are spitting in Arabian AND RUSSIAN faces right now, and hoping to get responses. The MSM will show you any responses over and over-MIND CONTROL style, so the planned aggression agreed upon months or even years back can take place and the world will be propagandized to think it "justified". Much like daddy might think he is justified for whipping your ass for hitting your baby brother, even though you brother spit in your face and even taunted you about it.
(personal note---I dont have a brother, but simply made the story up as an example, and no I never beat up on a family member big or small---LOL). Its passive-aggressive behavior taken to the extreme where the aggressor is getting to make itself out to be "the victim".


That is my opinion, you can call me kook all you like, but I really think if the Israelis and Likudniks wanted peace, they would define their borders, and wall them off quickly as possible, they'd also lobby hard for AMERICA to accept any Palestinians who wanted to live HERE to come move HERE to America where they'd eventually assimilate and forget all about living in the hot-ass desert. But that would be a solution, and Israel doesn't get the West Bank and more of Gaza for that. I honestly think the long term plan of some of the likudniks is to actaully gain some of Southern Syria, southern lebanon, norther Egypt (not all the way to the Nile, but a military buffer zone), and possibly some of Jordan. The "True Believers" like John Hagee consider the "Royal Grant" of all the land as far east as the Euphrates River God's gift to Israel. So they are for any conflict that can cause a war, whereby victorious Israel grabs more land after they win reaching towards this goal, saying they need it for "security", a catchall phrase these days used to justify about anything. The likudniks think long-term, multi-generational. Most people think in terms of the next 20 years or so......but not these folks who think a century ahead.

M

American Goy said...

"That is my opinion, you can call me kook all you like, but I really think if the Israelis and Likudniks wanted peace, they would define their borders".

"you can call me kook all you like"
WHY the hell would I do that?

I could tell a person that he/she is wrong, and then explain my reasoning, but name calling is beneath me...

Now, Hagee is a different matter...

"I really think if the Israelis and Likudniks wanted peace, they would define their borders"

I agree with you on this.

The daddy protecting the brat analogy is a great one, but only if we, the daddy, continue to be idiots.

That era might be coming to an end.

And it is a great example of using NFL athletes meeting and the media writing conspiracy stories about collusion.

The absence of ANY mainstream media reporting on the Bilderberg meetings truly frightens me.

I have not, before today, looked for mainstream news media sources on this - that there are none terrifies me.

Kook?

One of the best comments on this blog, man!

zfolwick said...

erm. . . why not blow it up?

All those names there. . . Would be tempting for a terrorist.

That'd be one reason for keeping it secret.

Anonymous said...

zfolwick,

Ive thought about reasons why something like you have suggested frankly have never happened. The fac that it has not happened and there have never been any attempts SPEAK VOLUMES. There are enough ex-military-pro-sovereignty-types out there who could possibly make something like that happen (a bomb is something that has to be "set in place", but a bomb put on a missile with GPS coordinates pre-programmed therein, and tipped with sarin gas as well as explosives, is something that could be fired from a remote location in Virginia, fingerprints wiped off and removed, and quickly buried in a pre-dug forrest hole----covered up with dirt and leaves to delay an FBI investigation for months (a cold trail is the hardest to follow)..................is indeed something doable for someone versed in those arts. In fact, if someone was "risky" and could put the small-launcher in the back of a van, the thing could be taken to a secure garage and smelted down to nothing erasing any evidence at all----if someone could just get away with it. Any aforesaid self-propelling missile that could fly maybe 80 feet off the ground probably wouldn't even set off radar. Its certainly doable. If you think of the world-wide intelligence agencies that would probably "like" to see something like this happen, the fact that it hasn't speaks volumes. The volumes of which I speak are that the elite probably knows an astounding amount about people out here in the heartland that they consider "threatening".


I think that any potential subversives are rooted out ahead of time to be honest. I keep in mind that our entire phone system is compromised by Israeli-technology---so ANYONE'S phone activities (unless you have an illegal telephone that switches frequences constantly in which the FBI will come and bust your ass for possessing as if it were a boatload of coke). Where you spend time on the net is probably also flagged and investigated if you spend x-amount of time on sites that sell the kind of equipment that would give you a homemade 30 or 40 mile-range rocket. I imagine its the rocket or missile technology that they "watch", as bombs are pretty straightforward.


To be honest, Im suprised Hezbollah, the Iranian Secret Service, the Federal State Security Service of Russia (which is just the updated KGB), or even China's spook service hasn't seen fit to attempt to kill David Rockefeller in particular. Its my opinion that he is the prime mover in the push for deregulatory activities to bring an absolute world-market into existence, with rules infractions litigated in an transnational body, on every square inch of this planet. We have a world bank that could end up functioning as the world's CENTRAL BANK, with control of the money supply, and if it could get in control of a one-world currency, the path to autocratic type control without elections to end the power-cycle could be in reach for the world's elite for the first time. In the meantime, central banks given control over things like the European Common Market, or the proposed North American Union, would be mini-steps towards this sort of goal. Rockefellers and Rothchilds are arlready bankers in China though.....so the globalists tentacles have even reached there.

Its better to be a central banker or a corporate tycoon-in control of a IMMORTAL corporation like Ford Motor Company, GE, or Chase Manhattan Bank or Amerex, than merely being a term-limited president. Senators have it better than presidents do...........they only have to run for office every six years. This "big money" can, through media ownership, 527-ads, massive campaign dinners, corporate contributions, and personal contributions, fund the living-hell out of any preferred candidate. How in the world can a Dennis Kucinich, Mike Gravel, Ron Paul, Tom Tancredo break through when someone like Joe Biden and Chris Dodd and Fred Thompson got COMPLETELY IGNORED BY FOX, CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC in the last presidential primary season?

John Edwards in particular, got the shaft by the media in my opinion. The media "anointed" Guliani and Hillary at first, and pretty much only would mention Obama as Hillary's only real opposition. You never heard about anyone else. When Guilaini faltered, the media shifted their attention to McCain and the kooky Huckabee---whom they knew had no chance anywhere outside the south. Tancredo and Paul were treated as fringe oddities, and Thompson was constantly described as "old" (hell, hes almost a decade younger than McCain) and Romney was pelted with "mormon" and "multi-millionaire" every time his name got mentioned.

Did you know that Juan (sorry, I hate the guy) McCain only got about 30 percent of the total vote in the Republican primary, but due to the fact that he won all the states with "winner-take-all" votes, he ended up with the most delegates easily? The left-most states have been allowed to make their primaries "winner take all", vastly increasing the amount of delegates to the convention that they get and vastly increasing their representative share of importance. I have a problem with McCain taking 31% of the vote in Florida but getting ALL of FLorida's delegates, but only getting 16% of Tennessee's vote, but still getting some delegates to the convention based on such a measley showing there. All primaries should be proportional. The parties "penalizing" states for moving their primaries forward is an attempt to keep the status quo of letting a small-left-leaning-state like New Hampshire, play a massively disproportionate role in our national electoral cycle. Iowa is bought off with more pork money than a Hollywood boulevard whore. The corn subsidy will never be seriously challenged as long as her primary comes first. The establishmnet has rigged the game quietly behind the scenes piecemeal for years but we all out here in America just didn't see it coming.


Its not just fringe-conspiracy theorists who should be concerned when they read about things like the CFR, Bilderbergers, or Bohemian Grove (there used to be a great ABC news story on Bohemain Grove on YouTube, I dont know if its still up, but its from 1980 and it was great---they admitted the people who run America get together there every year and obviously collude to make life better for its members at the expense of the rest of the republic, which is what all clubs pretty much do). There is an old saying: "If its planned, its war". Well, the elite have been making plans against the rest of humanity since the 50's (that we know of) when the first Bilderberger meeting was held in Europe.

The big-corporate/bank/legal "elites" can constantly affect the electoral results through their money-giving and media roles, but Joe Politician knows he has to get elected, so toeing the elite's line is just a cost of doing business to him.


I kind of hope Obama is just jiving AIPAC, and intends to deal with the Middle East in a novel way, but Im not betting on it. He is probably as in their pocket as Clinton was, knowing the media could make him unpopular in mere months if they decide to turn on him, and who is in de facto control of the media? The people who own it. And who "owns" the media? Viacom, General Electric, Disney, Murdoch............

It would be interesting to know who owns Gannett (who are the majority shareholders) and of the other large newspaper sydicates in America. Who owns the Village Voice alternate-weekly-empire? Who owns the talk radio stations (Clearchannel is one of these companies).................these are where opinions are molded. National Review has been run at a loss for years. Thats how important getting your side out there is to some----they will lose money in media expenditures just to make sure it gets published. I have an ugly ugly feeling that when one gets right down to it, they will find the elite own the media for the most part, and in this unelected role, get to pick the politicians they like for fawning coverage and the pols they dont like for criticism. I mean really, how in the hell can a doofus like Katie Couric get to read the news every night when there are real journalists out there? She was picked because she is stupid, and probably never questions the stories that come across the teleprompter as she is concerned whether her latest hairstyle will start a trend. Its all a sick joke to me, but Im stuck here having to hear it over and over again.

Bad Credit Girl said...

Thanks for your comment in my Blog AmericanGoy! Yes... your Blog is also certainly different!
XOXO - Niki

Anonymous said...

zfolwick,

why would terrorists consider attacking the names on that list if they're so wholesome and all the secret shit they do is only for the good of man?

these "terrorists" that hate the western world are fully aware about these people and how much these people want to destroy all the arabs and how they work for israel.

they're not idiots, and their holy war is to provide security for all muslims who israel wants to destroy for NO reason.

it's not conspiracy, jews and arabs have been fighting for as long as humans kept time, or at least since those "religions" were started.

why are these people on these bilderberg and other lists such high targets? because they ARE terrorists who threaten anyone at all in the world who disagrees with them.

Anonymous said...

infowars.com

Harold Fowler said...

very nicely written article.

JT
http://www.Privacy-Center.net

Anonymous said...

Unleashing a terrorist act on the Bilderberg conference would turn the 130 people inside into martyrs. It is better to keep them alive so we can watch them suffer when they are stripped of their power when the Revolution occurs. I am not talking about the Ron Paul Revolution, which was educational but ultimately meaningless in the short term.

Anonymous said...

Interesting stuff, but a couple things.

First, toward the end, you ask why no one saw them enter or leave Feinstein's house. This is because the entire press squad got it wrong and went to the Clinton's home and waited outside. No one knew they went to DF's house until it was over.

Second, *if* he went to the Bilderberg meeting, where did he find the time? An hour, not including travel time, so more like 1.5 hours, and then he met up with the reporters in Chicago? Where did he find time to meet with the Bilder's? Also, the Bilder's wouldn't be meeting at 9 or 10pm. Most are MUCH too old to be staying up that late in meetings ;)

Anonymous said...

just found this today: http://www.slate.com/id/2193220/

jaehood said...

What about the article about how he is taking the week off to vacation with his family.

thepage.time.com/2008/06/07/obamas-weekend-off/

Chimbles said...

The democratic party should just back out all together and declare McCain a winner right now. I mean after such a mudsling action how can they expect to hold any kind of respect in the general populace? Better luck in 4 years Democrats!

Josh said...

It was stated above: "The conclusions that a foreign country has such a powerful lobby that it influences American foreign policy?"

Thanks to the internet, even "non-elite" foreigners can now influence our presidential election! Is this just one internet instance or is money also being sent via the net to shape our future?

It seems anti-American governments could exploit this idea against "We The People". Non American citizens trying to influence my country just P....s me off to no end!

al-Jazeera video of Palestinians working online to elect "Obama" as president of The United States!http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/03/pali-gazans-cam.html

olovac said...

We have almost arrived at the perfect storm for the Globalists to pull a takeover without firing a shot. Their plan is to beat us (the populus)down on as many fronts as possible (see 1925 Germany) that we will welcome anyone to save us. Obama is merely a a very glib pawn of Mr.Rockefeller. I pray that I never see Blue helmets patroling my neighborhood. That will mean that America as a nation has died.