It's AIPAC time of the year again

Googling for AIPAC delegates, lets take one article at the top of a search page and analyze it.

I lucked out - this is actually an interesting article which sheds new light on the hullabaloo that is the AIPAC conference.

Note: this is not about the current treasonfest, but a past one.

Well worth reading, though, as some things are made very clear in it.

Nebraskans lobby congressional delegation at AIPAC conference, in The Jewish Federation of Omaha.

Two weekends ago, 10 Nebraskans journeyed to the nation’s capital to participate in a policy conference organized by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, which is arguably the most influential lobbying organization in America .

I am not disputing the power that this lobby group which acts in the interests of a foreign power which is hostile to America has over us.

They have us by the balls.

But Jews are not the only ones to flock to the group. Many Christians come to the event, too. And in an effort to broaden its base further, AIPAC has begun to reach out to African-Americans. In addition, as at previous gatherings, AIPAC invited more than 1200 students, including about 120 student government presidents of all faiths to join them.

Black Americans are now actively recruited to soften the racist image of Israel, which is in the business of oppressing brown people using my and yours tax money.

It does not go over well for the PR campaign in the 21st Century that AIPAC delegates and speakers were pretty much all white (other than a certain American with a moslem middle name...).

The conference is held over a three-day period and attracts speakers of great renown or expertise.

Former CIA Director James Woolsey and Steve Emerson, an international expert on terrorism, were representative of the experts from think tanks.

May I respectfully ask what is an ex CIA director doing?

Dear readers - do you think that this would be tolerated in ANY OTHER country?

A special guest was best-selling author and pastor, Dr. John Hagee.

Apart from blacks, the AIPAC is, as always, reaching out to the religious nutjobs here in America.

Interestingly, if you research Christian Jewish relations from antiquity to modern times, you will notice that those relations are at best strained, at worst murderous.

If you logically think about it, Judaism is a faith which is competing with Christianity for power, converts, standing. By definition, Christianity CANNOT support Judaism.

Nor can it support Islam, for the same reason.

Only in America were Christians so brainwashed into unconditional support of an apartheid regime which bombs Lebanese moslems and christians indiscriminately.

This brainwashing propaganda effort was so successful in America and nowhere else because, you see, American Christians are fucking idiots.

Truth hurts.

What is unique about the AIPAC program is that all the delegates share the same warmth toward Israel. That explains why centrists, conservatives, and liberals get along so well together: They all have a mindset that keeps in the forefront the goal of maintaining a strong U.S.-Israel relationship.

Got that?

Centrists, conservatives, and liberals get along so well together - they have one purpose.

One goal.

To promote Israeli interests over American interests, using the idiotic bribery (lobbying) American political system.

This one sentence, this crowing boast, proves to me the issue of "dual loyalty" - which is really code for "Israel first" over the nation one happens to be based in.

In this case, my nation.

This feeling of strong support for Israel contributes to the sometimes right-of-center political tilt of the members of the audience, who might on other issues follow a strictly liberal line of thought.

As if you needed more confirmation?

That mutual goal also makes it easy to understand the reception that Dick Cheney received when he spoke. The president-elect of AIPAC introduced the vice president as representing a very pro-Israel administration that has repeatedly stood with the Jewish state, especially during the recent war, supplying them with arms and other munitions, and speaking on their behalf at the G-8 and in other important venues.

Here are the liberals applauding Dick Cheney.

Let that sink in for a while.

What kind of a "liberal" (disclaimer - I consider myself a liberal/socialist) applauds fucking Dick Cheney?

He who created the Office of Special Plans, staffed by Israeli agents to help push America into war?

Answer: a Jewish-American "liberal".

A Jewish-American "liberal" who fights racism in America while supporting it in apartheid Israel, a Jewish-American "liberal" who campaigns to keep my country's borders open and supports multiculturalism - in America - while supporting monoculture in Israel and the need to keep the Israeli borders closed to people who lived on those lands for thousands of years (all to accommodate Joe Schmoe from Brooklyn, living his racist fantasies on a hilltop in Palestine somewhere).

A Jewish-American "liberal" who fights for minority rights and speaks against racists, in America, while lobbying to strip the rights from brown people in Israel and openly speaks in racist terms about Palestinians.

Lets play a word association game now.

One of these words in the next line does not fit.

Which one?


A Jewish American Liberal.

A Jewish American.

Lets continue with this joke of an article.

Still, all the politicians who come also see a value in having as an ally the only true democracy in the Middle East.

That is no longer the case, as the Arab Spring is very hard to miss?

No one can make this (even then) false statement of being the only democracy in the Middle East today.

Still, all the politicians who come also see a value in having as an ally the only true democracy in the Middle East. And quite a few of them fall over themselves to identify their Jewish connections, whether by marriage, ancestral lineage or by grandchildren.

Pathetic.

To thunderous applause, evangelical pastor John Hagee gave the overwhelmingly Jewish crowd a look at the “Hell, fire, and damnation” type of speech his parishioners see when he shouted out, “I went to Israel as a tourist and returned as a Zionist.”

Yup, but Johnny boy, you were, are and will be an idiot.

Former CIA director James Woolsey describing Iran, said, “Iran wants the bomb to dominate the region … and Israel would be its first target.” He added that Iran could conceivably become the first martyr nation, if they bombed Israel and then had destruction rain upon them, in the retaliation attacks that followed.

Woolsey is insane.

How did this loon climb the career ladder to become the spy master of my poor, pitiful nation?

Logical thinking - no nation's leadership, no matter how crazy or suicidal or insane they seem (or are portrayed as in the propaganda no your TV) wants to be destroyed.

No crazy dictator wants to die a martyr.

Dictators, by definition, are pathological psychopaths (read up on the Ponerology).

Psychopaths might not have human empathy, and might not care one whit about the rest of humanity.

But they do care about one person - themselves.

They will maneuver and act and do anything and everything possible to stay in power.

Is Woolsey ignorant of basic human nature?

On the final day, following a speech by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi

Good ole Nancy, an great Israeli politician in the American House of Representatives.

But fuck it, lets continue:

On the final day, following a speech by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, the delegates dispersed to see their representatives to discuss three basic issues. Jan Schneiderman led a delegation to see Ben Nelson. She thanked him for his support of Israel and her group discussed the first of the agenda items: the need for more sanctions against Iran to keep them from becoming a nuclear power.

Wait a second.

Lets scroll up and notice the source and the title.

Source: "The Jewish Federation of Omaha".
Title: "Nebraskans lobby congressional delegation at AIPAC conference".

Yes, 10 Jewish hillbillies from Nebraska went all the way to Washington to lobby their local representatives.

And the most burning, most topical, most important topic of these Nebraskans?

Jobs? No?

Economy? No?

Our great depression? No?

Our porous, totally open borders? No?

What then, do these Nebraskans care about, what do these American patriots lobby their America political representatives, what passion burns in their hearts?

Number one issue in Nebraska is (DRUMROLL):

Jan Schneiderman led a delegation to see Ben Nelson. She thanked him for his support of Israel and her group discussed the first of the agenda items: the need for more sanctions against Iran to keep them from becoming a nuclear power.

What do these Nebraskans care about next?

What is their second burning issue?

Jobs, economy, American securi...

The second issue explained to the Senator was the importance of his vote to approve military aid for Israel.

Of course, Israel is much more important than American jobs, American economy, American security, and the first two points deal with it, but maybe the third point will squeeze in an American centric issue, jooooooobssssssss, orrrrrrr

The last issue concerned the desire for Sen. Nelson to sign on to a letter urging Secretary Rice to keep the Quartet (the European Union, the United Nations, Russia, and the United States) on board in denying recognition to the Hamas-led government

Fuck.

This is a past AIPAC conference, but I feel that it explains a lot about what AIPAC is and what it stands for.


Lets look at the 2011 iteration:

AIPAC 2011 schedule, includes:

The Honorable Barack Obama
President of the United States

The Honorable John Boehner (R-OH)
Speaker of the House, U.S. House of Representatives

The Honorable Harry Reid (D-NV)
Majority Leader, U.S. Senate

The Honorable Robert Casey (D-PA)
U.S. Senate

The Honorable John Thune (R-SD)
U.S. Senate

The Honorable Eric Cantor (R-VA)
Majority Leader, U.S. House of Representatives

The Honorable Steny Hoyer (D-MD)
Democratic Whip, U.S. House of Representatives

Mr. Jim Woolsey
Former Director, Central Intelligence Agency



Not much has changed.

Both the leaders of the two American parties are there to answer the call of Israel.

Both Republicans and Democrats.

An Ex CIA (currently insane private citizen) director.

Well, lately I've heard our "boy emperor 2" president mumble something about the need for Israel to recognize the 1967 borders.

Is an American president growing cojones?

Guardian, UK, May 19, 2011, excerpt of Obama's speech:

The United States believes that negotiations should result in two states, with permanent Palestinian borders with Israel, Jordan, and Egypt, and permanent Israeli borders with Palestine. The borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps, so that secure and recognized borders are established for both states. The Palestinian people must have the right to govern themselves, and reach their potential, in a sovereign and contiguous state.

Well holy shit.

The full and phased withdrawal of Israeli military forces should be coordinated with the assumption of Palestinian security responsibility in a sovereign, non-militarized state. The duration of this transition period must be agreed, and the effectiveness of security arrangements must be demonstrated.

Fuck me.

That's balls.

Other than the "non-militarized state", which is code for "defenseless against Israel", these are heady words.

Of course, with American politicians, it's watch what they do, not what they say.

All in all, a somewhat impartial speech re: Israelis and Palestinians.

American president not 200% pro Israel?

What... what happened?

I mean, the worldwide Israeli juggernaut was rolling along so well.

Here are pictures of world leaders kow-towing to their masters:


















Not so secret Jews?

What's going on here?

I mean no one finds it a tad bit insane that all these world leaders wear a RELIGIOUS head covering?

I understand that a dignitary visiting an African country may wear a traditional costume to please the local politicians (note - this almost never happens, usually African politicians wear very expensive western suits).

What I do not understand is how a Christian can wear another faith's (by definition, by default, a hostile faith) symbol.

How can a Christian do that?

Would you see a Jewish person wear a crucifix when visiting a Catholic nation, like Ireland or Poland?

Or wear the orthodox "pop" cross when visiting Russia?

Would an American politician wear a moslem head covering when visiting the UAE, Egypt, Yemen?

But wait, there is one guy missing.

I mean, there is NO WAY someone named Barack Hussein Obama would...














Fuck.


















Me.